cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
Date Thu, 11 May 2017 09:40:34 GMT
Hi Rajani,


While they are not blockers, but please consider merging these bugfix PRs:


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2075
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2070


Thanks.


Regards.


________________________________
From: Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org>
Sent: 11 May 2017 10:10:35
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Thanks for testing Mike.

RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR

Any other additions?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
(Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com) wrote:

I've been running regression tests against the release candidate.

So far, all tests but one have passed.

The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It
looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this
thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for
managed storage in a particular situation.

As a result of this, I was going to vote -1.

I'm guessing the fix will not be complicated, but is important.

I don't yet have the fix, however. Once I do, I can reply to
this thread.

On May 10, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org>
wrote:

I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before
creating
RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it.

If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections,
we
can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3.

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Wido den Hollander (wido@widodh.nl)
wrote:

Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens
<williamstevens@gmail.com>:

Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only
with basic
networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes
noticeable when
you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?

Well, the provisioning is the same between Basic and Advanced.
The VR is utterly slow in doing that.

It happens when you have a lot of VMs in those networks.

In our case we have a couple of thousands VMs.

What I'd like to prevent is that this is merged into 4.9.3, but
is not in 4.10.

However, I don't want to delay 4.10 any longer.

Wido

On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" <wido@widodh.nl>
wrote:

+0

I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us
4.10 would
be a problem due to the VR performance.

A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any
longer:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089

Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is utterly
slow.

Wido

Op 9 mei 2017 om 7:31 schreef Rajani Karuturi
<rajani@apache.org>:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up
for a

vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=

fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204

Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
to

indicate

"(binding)" with their vote

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message