cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
Date Thu, 11 May 2017 05:08:19 GMT
Is 1866 ready? It looks like CI is failing on a lot of relevant network
tests.

On May 11, 2017 12:48 AM, "Jayapal Uradi" <jayapal.uradi@accelerite.com>
wrote:

Hi Rajani,

Also please  include the PR#1866.

Thanks,
Jayapal

> On May 11, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing Mike.
>
> RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR
>
> Any other additions?
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
> (Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com) wrote:
>
> I've been running regression tests against the release candidate.
>
> So far, all tests but one have passed.
>
> The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It
> looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this
> thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for
> managed storage in a particular situation.
>
> As a result of this, I was going to vote -1.
>
> I'm guessing the fix will not be complicated, but is important.
>
> I don't yet have the fix, however. Once I do, I can reply to
> this thread.
>
> On May 10, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before
> creating
> RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it.
>
> If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections,
> we
> can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3.
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Wido den Hollander (wido@widodh.nl)
> wrote:
>
> Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens
> <williamstevens@gmail.com>:
>
> Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only
> with basic
> networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes
> noticeable when
> you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?
>
> Well, the provisioning is the same between Basic and Advanced.
> The VR is utterly slow in doing that.
>
> It happens when you have a lot of VMs in those networks.
>
> In our case we have a couple of thousands VMs.
>
> What I'd like to prevent is that this is merged into 4.9.3, but
> is not in 4.10.
>
> However, I don't want to delay 4.10 any longer.
>
> Wido
>
> On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" <wido@widodh.nl>
> wrote:
>
> +0
>
> I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us
> 4.10 would
> be a problem due to the VR performance.
>
> A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any
> longer:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089
>
> Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is utterly
> slow.
>
> Wido
>
> Op 9 mei 2017 om 7:31 schreef Rajani Karuturi
> <rajani@apache.org>:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up
> for a
>
> vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=
>
> fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
>
> Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
> Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
> same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
> to
>
> indicate
>
> "(binding)" with their vote
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> ~Rajani
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/




DISCLAIMER
==========
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended
only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain,
copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of
this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any
liability for virus infected mails.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message