cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
Subject Re: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features
Date Tue, 09 May 2017 03:17:27 GMT
Thank you for getting this through your lab too Haijiao.  :)

*Will Stevens*
CTO

<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Haijiao <18602198181@163.com> wrote:

> Hi, Rajani, Will and Community
>
>
> Yes, we just finished the test in our lab.  We confirmed the latest PR
> 2062# has fixed the known issues about VPN disconnection due to any network
> change including VPN account add/delete.
>
>
> I will update the result in PR 2062# and I think it can be merged now.
>
>
> Thanks for your effort,  good job !
>
>
>
>
> 在2017年05月09 10时04分, "Rajani Karuturi"<rajani@apache.org>写道:
>
> It's waiting on test update from haijiao
>
> ~Rajani
>
> Sent from phone.
>
> On 8 May 2017 8:05 p.m., "Will Stevens" <wstevens@cloudops.com> wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062 should be ready to
> merge, I
> > think I had that one ready a couple weeks ago.
> >
> > *Will Stevens*
> > CTO
> >
> > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
> >
> > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Simon Weller <sweller@ena.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The only PR that is currently showing in blocker status is :
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062
> > >
> > > Are there others that should be tagged?
> > >
> > >
> > > - Si
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:43 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for
> > features
> > >
> > > Rajani,
> > >
> > >
> > > Can we have a list of outstanding blockers/issues?
> > >
> > >
> > > I also saw some enhancement PRs merged, which I think we should be
> > > avoiding and instead have our resources spent on fixing the release
> > > blockers, thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org>
> > > Sent: 08 May 2017 16:20:01
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for
> > features
> > >
> > > I disagree. The release process is taking long because we dont
> > > have enough people working on the release. Sometimes, even the
> > > blockers don't get enough attention. There is no point in adding
> > > features on already broken/blocked master which is not
> > > releasable. "un-freezing" master for new features shouldn't be
> > > the goal in my opinion. We should move towards faster
> > > releases/release cycles.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > ~ Rajani
> > >
> > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> > >
> > > On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland
> > > (daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > LS,
> > >
> > > In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are
> > > waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs
> > > certainly must be solved, users that are not hindered by those
> > > bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose we will
> > > fork on the first RC branches for future releases, so that
> > > development is not stopped for it. If the release process takes
> > > too long and to nice features get merged in between we can always
> > > decide to re-branch before releasing.
> > >
> > > Thoughts..?
> > > Daan
> > >
> > > daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> ( http://www.shapeblue.com
> )
> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > > rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message