cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Levitskiy <Sergey.Levits...@autodesk.com>
Subject Re: PRs for 4.10
Date Wed, 22 Feb 2017 22:54:46 GMT
I would like to get this added
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1935


On 2/22/17, 2:33 PM, "David Mabry" <dmabry@ena.com> wrote:

    I would like to see the following PRs merged:
    
    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1915
    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1954 <- This one could be backported to 4.8/4.9
    
    Collectively, these solve an issue that causes the VPC router to fail due to a full /var/log
FS.  We’ve tested these extensively in the lab and confirmed that it does solve the problem.
    
    Thanks,
    David Mabry
    
    On 2/22/17, 2:00 PM, "williamstevens@gmail.com on behalf of Will Stevens" <williamstevens@gmail.com
on behalf of wstevens@cloudops.com> wrote:
    
        I would like to get this fix in:
        https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1907
        
        This fix is really important because it causes routing issues when the IP,
        which was not cleaned up, is later used on a different VR.
        
        *Will STEVENS*
        Lead Developer
        
        <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
        
        On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
        wrote:
        
        > Rajani and all,
        >
        >
        > Please consider following PRs for review and merge:
        >
        >
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829 (XenServer HVM VM attached
        > disk limit bugfix, enough LGTMs and test results)
        >
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941 (same as above with
        > additional fixes, lacks review lgtms)
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1896 (translation updates)
        >
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1770 (template size issue
        > bugfix)
        >
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1950 (Ubuntu 16.04 packaging
        > tomcat6/7 support)
        >
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1951 (xenserver7 capability fix
        > and upgrade path from 4.9.2->4.9.3)
        >
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1944 (metrics view and infra
        > tab/UI performance improvement)
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1903 (cannot add users to vpc
        > vpn)
        >
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1945
        >
        > <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1945>https://
        > github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1946
        >
        > <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1946>https://
        > github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1947
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1856
        > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1212
        >
        >
        >
        > Regards.
        >
        > ________________________________
        > From: Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org>
        > Sent: 22 February 2017 14:41:42
        > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
        > Subject: Re: PRs for 4.10
        >
        > 6 days to go for the first RC.
        > Please get the required lgtms and tests ready for the PRs you like to see
        > in 4.10.
        > I will try to merge all the PRs that meet the criteria.
        >
        > Thanks,
        > ~Rajani
        >
        > On 19 Feb 2017 3:11 p.m., "Rajani Karuturi" <rajani@apache.org> wrote:
        >
        > > noted.
        > >
        > >
        > > ~ Rajani
        > >
        > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
        > >
        > >
        > > On February 17, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Frank Maximus (
        > > frank.maximus@nuagenetworks.net) wrote:
        > >
        > > I have a couple of bugfixes on previous version outstanding,
        > > which I would like to have merged to 4.10,
        > > both still requiring review:
        > > on 4.8: PR#1912 <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1912>:
which
        > > fixes password service running on internal lb vms, making it impossible
        > to
        > > do loadbalancing on port 8080
        > > on 4.9: PR#1925 <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1925>:
Minor
        > > plugin fix
        > >
        > > Kind Regards,
        > > Frank
        > >
        > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:56 PM Syed Ahmed <sahmed@cloudops.com>
wrote:
        > >
        > > I'd like to include https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1928 to
        > 4.10
        > > as well. This is a simple fix that adds hypervisor capabilities for
        > > XenServer 7
        > >
        > > Thanks,
        > > -Syed
        > >
        > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Will Stevens <wstevens@cloudops.com>
        > > wrote:
        > >
        > > Not sure, I will see if I can find some time tomorrow to look at this.
        > > Thanks...
        > >
        > > *Will STEVENS*
        > > Lead Developer
        > >
        > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
        > >
        > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org>
        > > wrote:
        > >
        > > Thanks Will. I will take a look at this today and merge.
        > >
        > > Is it possible to add a systemvmtemplate job on
        > > builds.apachecloudstack.net (https://builds.cloudstack.org/)
        > > similar to
        > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master/ ?
        > >
        > > Thanks,
        > >
        > > ~ Rajani
        > >
        > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
        > >
        > > On February 13, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Will Stevens
        > > (wstevens@cloudops.com) wrote:
        > >
        > > At this point, I think 1741 is ready to merge. I think we need
        > > one more
        > > LGTM though...
        > >
        > > *Will STEVENS*
        > > Lead Developer
        > >
        > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
        > >
        > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Will Stevens
        > > <wstevens@cloudops.com> wrote:
        > >
        > > @Daan: In order for the tests to pass with 1741, the tests have
        > > to be run
        > > with the SystemVM from the PR being used.
        > >
        > > *Will STEVENS*
        > > Lead Developer
        > >
        > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>
        > >
        > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Daan Hoogland
        > > <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
        > > wrote:
        > >
        > > About 1741, I started the packaging, Will but saw Boris making a
        > > remark about the system VMs. I'll look into that and start the
        > > tests.
        > >
        > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Will Stevens
        > > <williamstevens@gmail.com>
        > > wrote:
        > >
        > > I would like to get 1741(strongswan) in, but I need to get
        > > Trillian to
        > >
        > > run
        > >
        > > against it with a system vm built from my pr. I have done a CI in
        > > bubble
        > > and it came back clean, but would like confirmation through
        > > Trillian as
        > > well.
        > >
        > > On Feb 7, 2017 2:17 PM, "Milamber" <milamber@apache.org> wrote:
        > >
        > > And this PR for 4.9 but need to be foward to 4.10 too.
        > >
        > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1929
        > >
        > > 2 LGTM
        > > CI green
        > >
        > > On 07/02/2017 13:07, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
        > >
        > > Hi all,
        > > If you know of any PRs which meet the below criteria, please
        > > mail
        > >
        > > them to
        > >
        > > me.
        > > 1. No open questions.
        > > 2. Has two LGTMs
        > > 3. Has CI test results.
        > >
        > > ~Rajani
        > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com
        > >
        > > --
        > > Daan
        > >
        > >
        >
        > rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
        > www.shapeblue.com
        > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
        > @shapeblue
        >
        >
        >
        >
        
    
    

Mime
View raw message