cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.1.0 (RC1)
Date Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:35:00 GMT
+1 (binding)


- Based on upgrade tests from 4.5.2.2 to 4.9.1.0

- Upgrading a local 4.9.0 based Ubuntu/kvm setup

- Manual packaging and repository building

- Travis and Trillian test results from PR #1753 (vpc/rvr failures are known to be intermittent,
the feature implementation/usage is flaky)


Regards.


________________________________
From: Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com>
Sent: 15 December 2016 14:46:02
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.1.0 (RC1)

Hello,

It turned out it’s an issue with the way the upgrade was performed, I’ve run the cloudstack-setup-databases
on top of 4.9 code base and it basically created the 4.9 schema, the when I’ve imported
the backups on DB level it didn’t overwrite the 4.9 changes and they were still there with
DB version of 4.5.2.2. So that’s how the upgrade got messed, I’ve just verified it’s
not happening if I cleanup the DBs before importing cloud db.

I’ll proceed with rest of the upgrade paths now and will keep you posted.

Thanks,
Boris Stoyanov


boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On Dec 15, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> Thanks for the good way to fix this issue.
>
> I've tested too the upgrade from 4.9.1.0 RC1 to 4.10.0.0 snapshot with success now.
>
> Milamber
>
> On 15/12/2016 06:05, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>> Hi Bruno,
>>
>>
>> I checked the issue, the PR #1615 was merged only on master. Since, we've not started
release work for 4.10/master yet, I'll move the changes to appropriate sql schema. This is
not a blocker for either 4.8.2.0 or 4.9.1.0 as the changes/feature don't exist on them yet.
>>
>> Thanks again for sharing this, I'll fix them today.
>>
>>
>> All, since there is no blocker please continue with your tests and voting.
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Milamber <milamber@apache.org>
>> Sent: 14 December 2016 00:32:19
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.1.0 (RC1)
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm not sure, but perhaps we have an 'indirect' blocker for 4.9.1.0 RC1.
>>
>> Currently the upgrade from 4.9.1.0 RC1 to 4.10.0.0 SNAPSHOT don't works
>> because the schema-481to490.sql in the 4.9.1.0 / 4.9 doesn't contains
>> the commit of CLOUDSTACK-9438 (2e77496601ab5420723ce8b955b3960faaba7d5c).
>> (this commit is currently in master)
>>
>> When you try to make the upgrade you have this error: "Unknown column
>> 'image_store_details.display' in 'field list'"
>> see:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9671
>>
>> Currently there have 2 diff between the schema-481to490.sql in 4.9.1.0
>> RC1 (and 4.9 branch) and master branch.
>>
>> What is your opinion: blocker or not?
>>
>> Just copy the 2 sql request inside the schema-4910to41000.sql file (but
>> the commit 2e77496601ab5420723ce8b955b3960faaba7d5c contains other
>> modified files)?
>>
>> Milamber
>>
>>
>>
>> $ diff ./setup/db/db/schema-481to490.sql /tmp/MASTER-schema-481to490.sql
>> 547a548,552
>>  >
>>  > ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`image_store_details` CHANGE COLUMN `value`
>> `value` VARCHAR(255) NULL DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'value of the detail',
>> ADD COLUMN `display` tinyint(1) NOT
>>  > NULL DEFAULT '1' COMMENT 'True if the detail can be displayed to the
>> end user' AFTER `value`;
>>  >
>>  > ALTER TABLE `snapshots` ADD COLUMN `location_type` VARCHAR(32)
>> COMMENT 'Location of snapshot (ex. Primary)';
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/2016 21:36, Milamber wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> My vote +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers  (CS over CS)
>>> (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) :
>>>
>>> 1/ Fresh install of 4.9.1.0 RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.5 + KVM +
>>> NFS : OK
>>> Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create
>>> networks, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template,
>>> create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip
>>> release, static nat, firewall rule)
>>> Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with success too (create
>>> network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule)
>>>
>>> 2/ Test upgrade from 4.8.1 to 4.9.1.0 RC1 : OK
>>>
>>> 3/ Test upgrade from 4.8.2 RC1 to 4.9.1.0 RC1 : don't works (expected)
>>>
>>> 4/ Tests of all localization Web UI for 4.9.1.0 RC1:
>>> Localization works well except Spanish (not a blocker to release): the
>>> Web UI display partially the localization strings due of one bad
>>> carriage return in the label
>>> message.installWizard.copy.whatIsCloudStack string (from Transifex).
>>> This is the same issue that the 4.8.2 RC1.
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps add in the Release notes this Spanish l10n issue.
>>>
>>> Thanks to the RM.
>>>
>>> Milamber
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/12/2016 03:11, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've created a 4.9.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>>> vote:
>>>>
>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.1.0-RC20161210T0838
>>>>
>>>> Commit: af2679959b634d095b93b8265c6da294d360065d
>>>>
>>>> List of changes:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.9.1.0-RC20161210T0838
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>> location):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.1.0/
>>>>
>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Vote will be open for 120 hours, considering the process started
>>>> during the
>>>> weekends, and will end on 14 Dec 2016 end of the day.
>>>>
>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>>> indicate
>>>> "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message