cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Syed Ahmed <sah...@cloudops.com>
Subject Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1807: CLOUDSTACK-9633: Revert addition of `vhd` extention ...
Date Tue, 06 Dec 2016 04:50:45 GMT
I see. I was more interested in the functionality that is broken on
Cloudstack. I have verified that older operations are still working
correctly. Did I miss anything?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 23:44 Abhinandan Prateek <
abhinandan.prateek@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Syed,
>
>   Any test that is calling is_snapshot_on_nfs from utils.py will fail for
> Xen as it ends up appending an additional “.vhd” to the install_path. There
> are several of them both in smoke and component folder. The reason this is
> under scrutiny is die to marvin test failures.
>
>
>
> On 06/12/16, 9:33 AM, "Syed Ahmed" <sahmed@cloudops.com> wrote:
>
> >Yes this will break managed snapshot archives. I want to understand what
> >this revert is trying to fix and what tests were failing.
> >On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 22:38 abhinandanprateek <git@git.apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
> >>
> >>     https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1807
> >>
> >>     @syed can you look at this 'revert' i guess this is going to be an
> >> issue with the managed storage change that has been put in. cc @rhtyd
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
> your
> >> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
> feature
> >> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working,
> please
> >> contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA
> ticket
> >> with INFRA.
> >> ---
> >>
>
> abhinandan.prateek@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message