cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From marcaurele <>
Subject [GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1730: VMTemplateZone needs some love
Date Wed, 09 Nov 2016 10:53:36 GMT
Github user marcaurele commented on a diff in the pull request:
    --- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/ ---
    @@ -84,14 +84,11 @@ public VMTemplateZoneVO findByZoneTemplate(long zoneId, long templateId)
    +    @DB
         public void deletePrimaryRecordsForTemplate(long templateId) {
             SearchCriteria<VMTemplateZoneVO> sc = TemplateSearch.create();
             sc.setParameters("template_id", templateId);
    -        TransactionLegacy txn = TransactionLegacy.currentTxn();
    --- End diff --
    I looked a bit more into that, and `@DB` use the same class as `TransactionLegacy`, which
is different than `Transaction`. The change f62e28c1ec125263613d32856b11ef50b815e573 added
a new transaction API.
    Having the annotation or the line of code to create the transaction is similar. IMO the
annotation is cleaner.

If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.

View raw message