cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2
Date Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:57:23 GMT
Sorry, I did not follow the correct format.  :P

After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.9.0 *passes* with 6 PMC + 2
non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
* Rohit Yadav
* Mike Tutkowski
* Wido den Hollander
* Milamber
* Nux!
* John Burwell

+1 (non binding)
* Paul Angus
* Abhinandan Prateek

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating.

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Will Stevens <wstevens@cloudops.com> wrote:

> The vote is closed.  The RC passed with the following votes.
>
> +1 : 8 (including 6 binding)
> +0 : 0
> -1 : 0
>
> Thanks everyone, I will get this pushed out today...
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Abhinandan Prateek <
> abhinandan.prateek@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Did manual testing with a cluster of Xen 6.5 in advanced zone.
>> Vm life cycle
>> VM Snapshot, volume snapshots
>> Volume and Template from snapshots
>> Migration
>> Change Password
>> Change service offering
>> VPC, multiple tiers, VMs, ACLs
>>
>> Regards,
>> -abhi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29/07/16, 1:43 AM, "John Burwell" <john.burwell@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>
>> >All,
>> >
>> >I vote +1 (binding).  We have tested 4.9.0 RC2 in the following
>> environments:
>> >
>> >       • CentOS 6.8 management server + CentOS 6.8 KVM Hosts using NFS
>> primary and secondary storage (would allow us to verify/fix the documented
>> libvirt/qemu versions)
>> >       • CentOS 6.8 management server + vCenter 5.5u3d + ESXi 5.5u3b
>> using NFS primary and secondary storage
>> >       • CentOS 6.8 management server + vCenter 6.0u2 + ESXi Express
>> Patch 6 using NFS primary and secondary storage
>> >       • CentOS 6.8 management server + XenServer 6.2 SP1 using NFS
>> primary and secondary storage
>> >       • CentOS 6.8 management server + XenServer 6.5 SP1 using NFS
>> primary and secondary storage
>> >
>> >For each environment, we have run the following tests:
>> >
>> >       • All smoke tests
>> >       • test_accounts.py
>> >       • test_acl_*.py
>> >       • test_sharednetwork*.py
>> >       • test_add_remove_network.py
>> >       • test_advancedsg_networks.py
>> >       • test_affinity_groups*.py
>> >       • test_cpu_domain_limits.py
>> >       • test_cpu_limits.py
>> >       • test_cpu_max_limits.py
>> >       • test_host_maintenance.py
>> >       • test_memory_limits.py
>> >       • test_network_offering.py
>> >       • test_overcommit.py
>> >       • test_persistent_networks.py
>> >       • test_ps_domain_limits.py
>> >       • test_ps_limits.py
>> >       • test_ps_max_limits.py
>> >       • test_ps_resize_volume.py
>> >       • test_ps_resource_limits_volume.py
>> >       • test_resource_limits.py
>> >       • test_routers.py
>> >       • test_security_groups.py
>> >       • test_shared_networks.py
>> >       • test_snapshots.py
>> >       • test_ss_domain_limits.py
>> >       • test_ss_limits.py
>> >       • test_ss_max_limits.py
>> >       • test_templates.py
>> >       • test_update_vm.py
>> >       • test_volumes.py
>> >       • test_vpc.py
>> >
>> >During our tests, we found the following issues, but do not see any of
>> them as blockers:
>> >
>> >       • As Paul and Boris noted, the
>> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL in
>> test_vpc_redundant.py fails.  We are uncertain as to whether this failure
>> is caused by a defect, a problem with the test case, or our test
>> environment.
>> >       • We have seen NPEs in the log every 10 minutes attempting to
>> garbage collect a non-existent XenServer volume previously attached to a
>> VR.  While ugly, it is not leaving unused volumes to consume disk space.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >-John
>> >
>> >>
>> >john.burwell@shapeblue.com
>> >www.shapeblue.com
>> >53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
>> >@shapeblue
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Paul Angus <paul.angus@shapeblue.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm getting a pass on KVM for
>> /marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
>> >> And a FAIL on VMware for the same test, with the same error.
>> >>
>> >> 2016-07-28 04:00:52,133 - CRITICAL - FAILED:
>> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL: ['Traceback (most
>> recent call last):\n', '  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py",
>> line 369, in run\n    testMethod()\n', '  File
>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 537, in
>> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL\n
>> self.check_routers_state(1)\n', '  File
>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 304, in
>> check_routers_state\n    self.query_routers(count, showall)\n', '  File
>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 297, in
>> query_routers\n    "Check that %s routers were indeed created" % count)\n',
>> '  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 553, in
>> assertEqual\n    assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg)\n', '  File
>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 546, in _baseAssertEqual\n
>> raise self.failureException(msg)\n', 'AssertionError: Check that 1 routers
>> were indeed created\n']
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards,
>> >>
>> >> Paul Angus
>> >>
>> >> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
>> >> www.shapeblue.com
>> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> >> @shapeblue
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: williamstevens@gmail.com [mailto:williamstevens@gmail.com] On
>> Behalf Of Will Stevens
>> >> Sent: 28 July 2016 17:24
>> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2
>> >>
>> >> The teardown issue looks to be environmental.  Apparently the network
>> did not get cleaned up before the network service offering using it was
>> attempted to be deleted.
>> >>
>> >> I am not sure about the test_vpc_redundent test failure.  I run that
>> test all the time on KVM and have not been getting that problem.  Do you
>> get the same thing if you run it again in your environment?
>> >>
>> >> *Will STEVENS*
>> >> Lead Developer
>> >>
>> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw
>> @CloudOps_
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Boris Stoyanov <
>> boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi we’ve run: test_vpc_redundant and got :
>> >>>
>> >>> 2016-07-28 16:36:29,959 - CRITICAL - FAILED: test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers:
>> >>> ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '  File
>> >>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run\n
>> >>> testMethod()\n', '  File
>> >>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 620, in
>> >>> test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers\n    self.check_routers_state()\n', '  File
>> >>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 353, in
>> >>> check_routers_state\n    self.fail("Expected \'%s\' routers at state
>> >>> \'%s\', but found \'%s\'!" % (expected_count, status_to_check,
>> >>> cnts[vals.index(status_to_check)]))\n', '  File
>> >>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 450, in fail\n    raise
>> >>> self.failureException(msg)\n', "AssertionError: Expected '1' routers
>> >>> at state 'MASTER', but found '0'!\n"]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Deleting network offering while in use?
>> >>>
>> >>> 2016-07-28 16:38:41,560 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION:
>> test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers:
>> >>> ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '  File
>> >>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 398, in run\n
>> >>> self.tearDown()\n', '  File
>> >>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 281, in
>> >>> tearDown\n    raise Exception("Warning: Exception during cleanup :
>> %s" %
>> >>> e)\n', "Exception: Warning: Exception during cleanup : Execute cmd:
>> >>> deletenetworkoffering failed, due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Can't
>> >>> delete network offering 35 as its used by 1 networks. To make the
>> >>> network offering unavaiable, disable it\n"]
>> >>>
>> >>> Our setup is centos68 with xen6.2 hosts.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com
>> >>> www.shapeblue.com
>> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jul 27, 2016, at 6:20 PM, Haijiao <18602198181@163.com<mailto:
>> >>> 18602198181@163.com>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi, Gents
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone tested RC2 with redudant VR configuration ?  I think there are
>> some
>> >>> issues not fixed yet, e.g. password server.
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> We will test these days and come back.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>> abhinandan.prateek@shapeblue.com
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message