cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:15:57 GMT
Thanks Nux.

Should the following information be added to the Release Notes and the
Upgrade documentation?

Make sure these are added to db.properties:

db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql
db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql
db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql

I had a look at the files and they seem to have the correct values.  EG:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/utils/conf/db.properties

What do you guys think?

Cheers,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Other than using Wido's quick fix in db.properties, everything else checks
> out as far as I can tell.
>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Good job
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nux!" <nux@li.nux.ro>
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:08:19
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>
> > Cool, thanks for clarifying. Too bad Strongswan didn't make it.
> > I'll test shortly.
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Will Stevens" <wstevens@cloudops.com>
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:07:02
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >
> >> Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like
> >> strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release...
> >>
> >> *Will STEVENS*
> >> Lead Developer
> >>
> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>>
> >>> Nux!
> >>> www.nux.ro
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> > From: "Will Stevens" <williamstevens@gmail.com>
> >>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
> >>> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
> >>>
> >>> > Hi All,
> >>> >
> >>> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
> >>> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
> >>> >
> >>> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
> >>> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
> >>> >
> >>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >>> > location):
> >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
> >>> >
> >>> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
> >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >>> >
> >>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>> >
> >>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> >>> indicate
> >>> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>> >
> >>> > [ ] +1  approve
> >>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> >
> > >> > Will
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message