cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Master is frozen for the 4.9 release
Date Wed, 08 Jun 2016 01:01:00 GMT
Yes. I agree. I need to get some commitment from someone to test it though.
I need to figure out how to test it once it gets in. Any takers for
validating this works after it goes in?
On Jun 7, 2016 8:54 PM, "ilya" <ilya.mailing.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

Sounds like a bug fix to me.. Bug fixes should be allowed in my opinion.

On 6/7/16 4:07 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> Op 28 mei 2016 om 0:34 schreef Will Stevens <williamstevens@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>> Hey All,
>> I think I have done what I can do at this point.  I am sorry if you have
a
>> PR that you wanted to get in that didn't make it.  I pushed my deadline
for
>> the freeze a bit because I had a lot of PRs that were close and I was
able
>> to get a bunch of them in.
>>
>> I plan to wait about a week before I cut the first RC to give people a
>> chance to test master and get me the details of their testing.  This will
>> reduce the number of RCs we will need to have in order to get this
release
>> out the door.
>>
>> Please start testing master and let me know if you run into any issues.
>> There are a couple periodic issues that show up in my CI environments,
so I
>> will probably spend some time to see if I can get those sorted out
before I
>> cut the first release.
>>
>> I plan to create a Github PR that will never be merged where I can post
CI
>> results against master for this release so we can troubleshoot anything
we
>> find.  This approach is mainly because my workflow with `upr` lets me
post
>> results easily and include the logs for the run.
>>
>
> I would like to get some attention for this PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1547
>
> Currently in Basic Networking multiple ranges per VLAN/POD is broken, the
VR doesn't take the additional IP addresses.
>
> That PR fixes that (and is running in production at us), but this has
been broken since 4.7
>
> I would like 4.9 to have this fixed as it's a known issue right now. Can
we do that?
>
> Wido
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Will

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message