cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: RM after 4.9
Date Tue, 31 May 2016 04:34:43 GMT
Thanks Will and Mike..

Thanks John. we can work together with help from Will.


~Rajani

Accelerite CloudPlatform <http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/>


On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:58 AM, John Burwell <john.burwell@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> All,
>
> I am also willing to be an RM post 4.9, as well as, for LTS.  I will be
> able to serve as an RM through at least the end of 2016.
>
> To kickoff the planning process, I have started a release cycle discussion
> on the list to pin down the schedule for both regular and LTS releases.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> >
> john.burwell@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
> On May 27, 2016, at 12:00 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Rajani! :)
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Rajani Karuturi <rajanikaruturi@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 8:49 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: RM after 4.9
> >
> > I volunteer to be the RM for next release
> >
> > Thanks
> > On 03-May-2016 4:13 AM, "Will Stevens" <williamstevens@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >> As you all know, I am the RM for the 4.9 release.  Unfortunately, this
> is
> >> not a position I will be able to maintain for the long term, so we
> should
> >> start this discussion sooner rather than later.
> >>
> >> I am actively working to simplify the RM role by working towards the
> >> following goals:
> >> - Get the cloudstack repo moved to the 'apache-cloudstack' github org
> so we
> >> can use labels, etc so the community can better organize itself
> regarding
> >> the status of different PRs
> >> - Make it easier to setup distributed CI environments so the RM is not
> >> responsible for all the CI.
> >> - Build tooling to simplify contributing back the results of CI runs.
> >> - Improve our set of 'standard tests' to be more complete yet still
> >> manageable to be run on every PR.
> >>
> >> I will continue to work towards lowering the bar for the RM, but we
> need to
> >> start the conversation of who is next in line as the RM.  :)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Will
> >>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message