Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1305E19B63 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43502 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2016 20:53:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 43444 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2016 20:53:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 43417 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2016 20:53:35 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:53:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 615791802E7 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:53:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kEmc34dKvCXi for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E0BBA5F39C for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id u206so61522795wme.1 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:53:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RnqRbmEIoZGWGKn5/SWRsLJfdqhawvIuCh4CohO9GAs=; b=qY10Kg+mos1A/5OnpvuByQEBvXvVBpAB03BeDIzTMU0MtmZqJ/dI1xYuhmA16TPko4 87+ps4BGm7YLDLodFrrRgOKpAvY6RgkZAHoq2HBQVNteQL579XfZsz9VUsxABtzuQUYb lYHs8qWyu9/xC/WqeuUKRbbuouL1uqTTz/vIpwRGP6cIiX9TOUWlmVEAqOCI3/tUh6Ct UFeiOXufVSp+hAtZ+uvvWTJOwXtk3qQGir0n4AM3EoazqsvI2YLui9sh9FfnHR3P/O8+ S9P04x1qw8+sX1h8itnp8R53BSCmwj7b7Y4IjkucyraSHGyZsni3QtoC0VmRnsYhY+08 LwEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=RnqRbmEIoZGWGKn5/SWRsLJfdqhawvIuCh4CohO9GAs=; b=NeexWxqPamuswDdSiEBDBJsrVnfgXO6c6S8L6OOjuhY1AMwiBdV0jvu329OTxIpT8v 3XJYi+pz8iWNRpu61XllPuLp9QAVfI5GJa9lrelCvxNhl852c3y8MIw0PFTQQAW3tDUf rSSow51XwtDKoRBh5ajTxhEmDll9T64xvP3wEdg2uFuVehqZBKEpcfcQwnl95CEjuq70 Giw531Wrt/uj+BlYSxG1gQrgMQ/+FThriaLLitdFuv4PLFJUiGLYHEi+7MEv/gfN7xcA rxhjCl0+woKj1ZJoWFn9adDVfKAGmw36V84rJZPBSMxNdent50PYBcKjydvQ4wbzUqcA BVZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJM0zzl7zp6JTcs2i0u14aBEF+BsHE6mgHukUaFvcu5FEiI684HIOb0xGCdZM9WDasA1F+NjkTyJ1WdKA== X-Received: by 10.28.158.78 with SMTP id h75mr23831744wme.53.1459976009631; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:53:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.125.67 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:53:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Daan Hoogland Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 22:53:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Jenkins on PRs To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b386c6f4e1c052fd7272a --001a114b386c6f4e1c052fd7272a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 basically this means you have to ask the submitter, Will On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > ok, thanks... > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > strangely the timeout wasn't reached on those jobs. I upped the timeout > > anyway. let's see what happens. > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Daan Hoogland > > wrote: > > > > > you are right, there are three of those in the preserved history. I > will > > > look at the timeout configuration for the job. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Will Stevens > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I have been seeing it fail more often than usual with "timeout" > errors. > > >> > > >> For example, this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1461 > > >> > > >> With this run: > > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/719/console > > >> > > >> *Will STEVENS* > > >> Lead Developer > > >> > > >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > > >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > > >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > >> > > >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoogland@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I've seen this one before: > > >> > > > >> > Tests in error: > > >> > SecondaryStorageManagerTest.getDefaultNetworkForAdvancedNonSG:79 > > >> > NoSuchMethod ... > > >> > SecondaryStorageManagerTest.getDefaultNetworkForAdvancedSG:102 > > >> > NoSuchMethod or... > > >> > > > SecondaryStorageManagerTest.getDefaultNetworkForAdvancedWrongZoneType > > >> > ? Unexp... > > >> > SecondaryStorageManagerTest.getDefaultNetworkForBasicNonSG:124 > > >> > NoSuchMethod or... > > >> > SecondaryStorageManagerTest.getDefaultNetworkForBasicSG:147 > > >> > NoSuchMethod org.a... > > >> > > SecondaryStorageManagerTest.getDefaultNetworkForBasicSGWrongZoneType > > >> > ? Unexpe... > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > it has been a reason of failure in more then one. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Daan Hoogland < > > daan.hoogland@gmail.com > > >> > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > looking at the history in [1] this is not true. most are > succeeding. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > [1] > https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/cloudstack-pr-analysis/ > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Will Stevens < > > >> williamstevens@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Hey All, > > >> > >> Anyone know what is going on with Jenkins? It seems to be > failing > > >> for > > >> > >> most > > >> > >> PRs. It seems to be timing out, but I am not a Jenkins wizard... > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Cheers, > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Will > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Daan > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Daan > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Daan > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > > > -- Daan --001a114b386c6f4e1c052fd7272a--