From dev-return-92020-apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive=cloudstack.apache.org@cloudstack.apache.org Fri Apr 15 06:49:12 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD8DD19F2D for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55064 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2016 06:49:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 55014 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2016 06:49:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 54997 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2016 06:49:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:49:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8B819C023E for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:49:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.909 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=persistentsystems.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DmqeU0PDKdAy for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HJ-SMTP-OUT.persistent.co.in (hjoutgoing1.persistent.co.in [103.6.33.102]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0FD3B5F3DA for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:49:07 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 0a2d0810-f79d66d000000a46-96-57108ee0b04a Received: from mail.persistent.co.in (Unknown_Domain [10.44.252.65]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by HJ-SMTP-OUT.persistent.co.in (HJ-SMTP-OUT @ Persistent Systems Ltd.) with SMTP id 9F.7B.02630.0EE80175; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:19:04 +0530 (IST) Received: from IND01-BO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.45.0.29) by ht.persistent.co.in (10.44.252.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:19:01 +0530 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=persistentsystems.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-accelerite-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=+RmsreENyEVQhssRa+U6EAjp23/pluoSRVBAsqfJltA=; b=IYc5VSqFAnN5BCBvA1wssA2mMxiHWsgQSkGC0EeaSw/TRCjXn8EiyEJg7hY/zGQ7HyZSiqEiPI96o+K05VODlctVfKrAH8h3+UAJjniIxhLISzsNf9Pm4we3EeMjrBMaolnx2rhdDYcBYXFXIKdtDasNteVBcsQKxL2SOh/ZJkY= Received: from MAXPR01MB0473.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.164.151.136) by MAXPR01MB0476.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.164.151.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.453.26; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:48:59 +0000 Received: from MAXPR01MB0473.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.151.136]) by MAXPR01MB0473.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.151.136]) with mapi id 15.01.0453.030; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:48:59 +0000 From: Anshul Gangwar To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic Zone on 4.9 Thread-Topic: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic Zone on 4.9 Thread-Index: AQHRldmKnvvQigZpdEidmmBWQQJDV5+IoddHgAB9WQCAAVEKAIAAKdmA Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:48:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1460589033311.78481@netapp.com> <1460594953767.36533@netapp.com> <1460693952286.17878@netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <1460693952286.17878@netapp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: cloudstack.apache.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cloudstack.apache.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=accelerite.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [121.244.36.226] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 114dbbdf-f3f8-48b5-cac1-08d364fa064a x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;MAXPR01MB0476;5:tuF81S8js+J1Gslpyy7F+9IpUVLvzbAvV88FJixkJZ60yGjIfCcGtamQG41J9R8Yt97LMu0f2UnqCGZiP59ZOVUPz9M/KSlc74eqkVWfFgitghyFRm3Dmk+U3N6FT8ib27vtv8GvSNvtZc+xwhyVyw==;24:MYgoWEaH9wQNptTJd9Q0atuf76nm2iRH9B+xvMwBXgFKZC5rydAsrGvAYcdcHcVKTKFrwTIoZhfSF0nX3H2L1csK6kKNVC3aE3/xPSVAbbA= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:MAXPR01MB0476; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(9101521026)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026);SRVR:MAXPR01MB0476;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:MAXPR01MB0476; x-forefront-prvs: 0913EA1D60 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(69234005)(24454002)(377454003)(77096005)(33656002)(15975445007)(9686002)(586003)(1720100001)(3900700001)(3846002)(1220700001)(10400500002)(189998001)(2501003)(81166005)(1096002)(102836003)(19580405001)(19580395003)(6116002)(2900100001)(2950100001)(15395725005)(36756003)(82746002)(92566002)(83716003)(87936001)(122556002)(11100500001)(2906002)(76176999)(50986999)(2351001)(54356999)(93886004)(86362001)(107886002)(110136002)(450100001)(66066001)(106116001)(5008740100001)(5002640100001)(15519875005)(50270200001)(104396002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:MAXPR01MB0476;H:MAXPR01MB0473.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <9B0667778B02114DA2E4E02F380D180B@INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Apr 2016 06:48:59.7507 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 1f4beacd-b7aa-49b2-aaa1-b8525cb257e0 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MAXPR01MB0476 X-OriginatorOrg: accelerite.com X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA3WSa0gUURTHuzuz07i0cTU3D9uDbcqobK3FMsUH2UMM7ClUVFDT7FUnd2eH nU2yoEyzbCPLHpomlZXGhj2wICvXTP2gUeSHxEUqyix6QEIgRYg1u7NBEM2Hy++eOffH/84c loq6x5hZUfIQt8Q7OMZAG+aPZljfVOBNC9+/XZI08I5ZirLaSo/q1qEtxSiVlySXh/cQi50o QhqXIQjEQdyiWsgmebzDskJUBAcvOombs4j2NG4RZ5EdvECcRPKkcbwsE8nOpRss/zypapso WYgkuOyilJfGrcpZa01KWpxstXHps2faElIM6rpjWJ/f7rujl0ci91Q1ldPF6MpEL4pgAS+C ft/X8RpPht7XtxgvMrBR+K4OGl4MUtqmE0HD4GhoQ+PzFLTX9Oi1NwEEvX0Xwme6EXxoOUwF ZYwqrnjaRQc5GqfAaMUNXZAn4a3w88R9nVbfBrXVAUbjTPjY2x0KQuNYuNZ9LOQx4uXwYuRc OMc9BJUD1SFpBLZCac3NECM1+fcnTSEphWNgYOiiTrsRhqutzymNTfDp3VgoNsI+BD31I+Gm +fCsfwhpzEF9Xb96gFV5NXh/pAf7Abfq4O4jP631ZMLo6Z5wfwH4+wJhngflXbVhZyuCsfY4 jafCw5LK8WGRHh4d94Y/hRkOtvrokyiu9q/gGsdD4OwZRuMsKHlfQmkcB431X0JsxJHQUzNE X0L662hK/i6r4vTIVlGKl4lbERWPOjjxgitelJpRcDqtLG5Bl25mdiDMIm6CMS8Xb4rS84VK kbMDAUtx0cY1XrVktPNFe4nbtd2920GUDpSt/o5KymwSXFJQud2WkJycvHBJYkJCos32nzIX YySy6sJ56sQXEKIm+qPTsRHmYrR+tTnnSNu34fz2OU9spg11ppFpKx8EmmNTN2Z8H6zM3Vz3 9IDfc87WNv2N3FJ1TMeUNTX5TzF10ftmOIWdpeM8hYc6y2ZNWnPWt7cj43HiOsv+X/byhpqY l59vbx63bG7zggkNfjT71Z2ZJZHi44HBjcPVpVxjrGy8nOucYTqTkr2To5V83jaPciv8b8VA TaDKAwAA Mike, what type of storage are you using? > On 15-Apr-2016, at 9:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike wr= ote: > > I'm not sure, Daan. > > I plan to keep an eye on this behavior for a while when creating new cloud= s. > > ________________________________________ > From: Daan Hoogland > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:12 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Ba= sic Zone on 4.9 > > Mike, did the iso copy process not complete as expected. Sound like they > are a remanence of some task ending in an exception. Probably a silently > ignored one ;| > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike > wrote: > >> Just an FYI, but when I kicked off my first VM in this cloud, the VR >> happened to get deployed to XenServer-6.5-3 (which was one of my XenServe= r >> hosts that had an un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary storage >> beforehand). >> >> Once the process of copying the system template down to local storage >> completed, the shared SR pointing at secondary storage went away (as you >> would expect). >> >> This leaves me now with one un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary >> storage on XenServer-6.5-1. >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Tutkowski, Mike >> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic >> Zone on 4.9 >> >> Hi, >> >> >> Has anyone recently observed the following behavior: >> >> >> http://imgur.com/8ALJmWb >> >> >> As you can see in the image, I have three 6.5 XenServer hosts in a >> resource pool. >> >> >> I just used them when creating a basic zone and the system VMs were >> deployed just fine. However, there are SRs pointing to secondary storage= on >> my XenServer-6.5-1 and XenServer-6.5-3 hosts still (there used to be one= on >> my XenServer-6.5-2 host, but it went away once the system VMs started up= on >> that host). >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mike >> > > > > -- > Daan DISCLAIMER =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the= property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only= for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you ar= e not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy,= print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communicat= ion in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message= . Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability fo= r virus infected mails.