cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anshul Gangwar <anshul.gang...@accelerite.com>
Subject Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic Zone on 4.9
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:48:59 GMT
Mike, what type of storage are you using?


> On 15-Apr-2016, at 9:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure, Daan.
> 
> I plan to keep an eye on this behavior for a while when creating new clouds.
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:12 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic Zone on
4.9
> 
> Mike, did the iso copy process not complete as expected. Sound like they
> are a remanence of some task ending in an exception. Probably a silently
> ignored one ;|
> 
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Just an FYI, but when I kicked off my first VM in this cloud, the VR
>> happened to get deployed to XenServer-6.5-3 (which was one of my XenServer
>> hosts that had an un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary storage
>> beforehand).
>> 
>> Once the process of copying the system template down to local storage
>> completed, the shared SR pointing at secondary storage went away (as you
>> would expect).
>> 
>> This leaves me now with one un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary
>> storage on XenServer-6.5-1.
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
>> Zone on 4.9
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> Has anyone recently observed the following behavior:
>> 
>> 
>> http://imgur.com/8ALJmWb
>> 
>> 
>> As you can see in the image, I have three 6.5 XenServer hosts in a
>> resource pool.
>> 
>> 
>> I just used them when creating a basic zone and the system VMs were
>> deployed just fine. However, there are SRs pointing to secondary storage on
>> my XenServer-6.5-1 and XenServer-6.5-3 hosts still (there used to be one on
>> my XenServer-6.5-2 host, but it went away once the system VMs started up on
>> that host).
>> 
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Daan




DISCLAIMER
==========
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the property of Accelerite,
a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity
to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to
read, retain, copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Accelerite, a Persistent
Systems business does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.

Mime
View raw message