cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: Multithreaded Builds
Date Sat, 23 Apr 2016 11:49:31 GMT
Thanks for the reports guys. :)
On Apr 23, 2016 7:22 AM, "Paul Angus" <paul.angus@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> My local builds (Centos6 on VMware Workstation) run happily using 4 cores.
> The speed itself is down to my overclocked processor, but still, it runs
> stably on 4 cores running at 25% over there stock speed.
>
> mvn -T 4.0C -Dnoredist install
>
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 03:20 min (Wall Clock)
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.angus@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:wido@widodh.nl]
> Sent: 22 April 2016 07:57
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Multithreaded Builds
>
>
>
> > Op 22 apr. 2016 om 00:03 heeft Will Stevens <williamstevens@gmail.com>
> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Well the multithreaded build did complete successfully and it took.
> >
> > real    7m3.933s
> > user    25m31.969s
> > sys     3m2.880s
> >
> > Which compares to a non-multithreaded build on the same machine which
> takes.
> >
> > real    10m8.288s
> > user    18m23.564s
> > sys     1m19.215s
> >
> > It is not a huge improvement, but for CI runs I will take any minutes
> > I can shave.  :)
> >
>
> Indeed! Locally I always run with 2C, works fine for me. Takes about 6
> minutes to build.
>
> Wido
>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Will
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Will Stevens
> > <williamstevens@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Is it a reasonable expectation for ACS to be able to be built using
> >> the `-T 1C` flag?  I am trying it now, but if it works once, it may
> >> not mean that it would always work.
> >>
> >> I see a lot of messages like this:
> >>
> >> [WARNING]
> *****************************************************************
> >> [WARNING] * Your build is requesting parallel execution, but project
>   *
> >> [WARNING] * contains the following plugin(s) that have goals not
> marked   *
> >> [WARNING] * as @threadSafe to support parallel building.
>   *
> >> [WARNING] * While this /may/ work fine, please look for plugin updates
>   *
> >> [WARNING] * and/or request plugins be made thread-safe.
>    *
> >> [WARNING] * If reporting an issue, report it against the plugin in
>   *
> >> [WARNING] * question, not against maven-core
>   *
> >> [WARNING]
> >> *****************************************************************
> >> [WARNING] The following plugins are not marked @threadSafe in Apache
> >> CloudStack Framework - Spring Life Cycle:
> >> [WARNING] org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.1
> >> [WARNING] Enable debug to see more precisely which goals are not
> >> marked @threadSafe.
> >> [WARNING]
> >> *****************************************************************
> >> [WARNING]
> *****************************************************************
> >> [WARNING] * Your build is requesting parallel execution, but project
>   *
> >> [WARNING] * contains the following plugin(s) that have goals not
> marked   *
> >> [WARNING] * as @threadSafe to support parallel building.
>   *
> >> [WARNING] * While this /may/ work fine, please look for plugin updates
>   *
> >> [WARNING] * and/or request plugins be made thread-safe.
>    *
> >> [WARNING] * If reporting an issue, report it against the plugin in
>   *
> >> [WARNING] * question, not against maven-core
>   *
> >> [WARNING]
> >> *****************************************************************
> >> [WARNING] The following plugins are not marked @threadSafe in Apache
> >> CloudStack API:
> >> [WARNING] org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.1
> >> [WARNING] Enable debug to see more precisely which goals are not
> >> marked @threadSafe.
> >> [WARNING]
> >> *****************************************************************
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Will
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message