cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tutkowski, Mike" <Mike.Tutkow...@netapp.com>
Subject Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic Zone on 4.9
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2016 04:19:12 GMT
I'm not sure, Daan.

I plan to keep an eye on this behavior for a while when creating new clouds.

________________________________________
From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:12 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic Zone on 4.9

Mike, did the iso copy process not complete as expected. Sound like they
are a remanence of some task ending in an exception. Probably a silently
ignored one ;|

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com>
wrote:

> Just an FYI, but when I kicked off my first VM in this cloud, the VR
> happened to get deployed to XenServer-6.5-3 (which was one of my XenServer
> hosts that had an un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary storage
> beforehand).
>
> Once the process of copying the system template down to local storage
> completed, the shared SR pointing at secondary storage went away (as you
> would expect).
>
> This leaves me now with one un-expected shared SR pointing at secondary
> storage on XenServer-6.5-1.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:10 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Strange XenServer SR behavior when deploying system VMs in Basic
> Zone on 4.9
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Has anyone recently observed the following behavior:
>
>
> http://imgur.com/8ALJmWb
>
>
> As you can see in the image, I have three 6.5 XenServer hosts in a
> resource pool.
>
>
> I just used them when creating a basic zone and the system VMs were
> deployed just fine. However, there are SRs pointing to secondary storage on
> my XenServer-6.5-1 and XenServer-6.5-3 hosts still (there used to be one on
> my XenServer-6.5-2 host, but it went away once the system VMs started up on
> that host).
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>



--
Daan

Mime
View raw message