cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: External fork of Cloudstack
Date Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:55:45 GMT
+1 (maybe put/fork upr in there to prevent any cleaning from happening? ;)

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Will Stevens <williamstevens@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes exactly. I don't think we should delete the org, just the repo. I think
> the usage of that org is out of scope for this conversation and will likely
> change based on this outcome. I think we should put that org on ice for the
> time being.
> On Mar 19, 2016 9:59 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Will Stevens <williamstevens@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I see you found the vote thread. Thanks for voting. :)
> > >
> > > For now I think it is best that we try to avoid using the cloudstack
> org
> > > for anything in order to mitigate confusion and try to get everyone on
> > the
> > > same page. We are charting new territory here, so removing as many
> > > unnecessary distractions and causes for cloudy perception of what we
> are
> > > trying to achieve is paramount IMO.
> > >
> > ​of course
> > ​
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I personally think we should remove the cloudstack/cloudstack repo at
> > this
> > > point as I think it is more of a liability in this process than
> anything.
> > >
> > ​yes, but only the repository and not the organisation
> > ​
> >
>



-- 
Daan

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message