cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: External fork of Cloudstack
Date Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:54:12 GMT
Yes exactly. I don't think we should delete the org, just the repo. I think
the usage of that org is out of scope for this conversation and will likely
change based on this outcome. I think we should put that org on ice for the
time being.
On Mar 19, 2016 9:59 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Will Stevens <williamstevens@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I see you found the vote thread. Thanks for voting. :)
> >
> > For now I think it is best that we try to avoid using the cloudstack org
> > for anything in order to mitigate confusion and try to get everyone on
> the
> > same page. We are charting new territory here, so removing as many
> > unnecessary distractions and causes for cloudy perception of what we are
> > trying to achieve is paramount IMO.
> >
> ​of course
> ​
>
>
> >
> > I personally think we should remove the cloudstack/cloudstack repo at
> this
> > point as I think it is more of a liability in this process than anything.
> >
> ​yes, but only the repository and not the organisation
> ​
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message