Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D28EF18DE8 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73831 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2016 08:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 73769 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2016 08:36:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 73757 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2016 08:36:59 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:36:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8E476C2DE7 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:36:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5INJppFcK9DY for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4E25C5F5CB for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id c200so14825649wme.0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:36:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5whdXKvvQAsQxN3QNiJpQT7KQ+5fTF8UJZkrB3pKRZo=; b=HTTTC7TuvfbR3iHt4kwp3Z7XFJwWW14u68D0i/3eSRHAV3x9hYcLWR0wBXeAy2BNQ/ rKJdkTE7mm81eQHCWtesuczkTAM3qp9Z99RrVqgF9bEIn7K/8vD4hDJeuJgUqidzJqSA DaymeYs569VvJWSwW43iYdVtpoOZxvjdzhIU//5ePraZ4g72RcK/GEGkeM30Ppc86Y6v +xH+CXxPEoRkXuISZKbL1pX7I7sBSiY0jvNsin5CFwYcZacxbcaL93s3WuFObYFUJpOs TIut1wojRHGyBMDgrBZjRBUjTws7fvW0nDZpQWuRqmofSjGcTn3aRAIInjDBJnHVWVuF fTJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5whdXKvvQAsQxN3QNiJpQT7KQ+5fTF8UJZkrB3pKRZo=; b=PpIp0Me+yg8k3SNNVru38e1k+S1c7KPsjpKZ22CzTNShkTBUgUy2Fhpn8dEAUyisk2 TrHXyYXkIEDXgY46jYdkRMG535TRkjL/g25cCCxdzQocU5AchUUJCxRvgCzuH3d1H/df eBWoqcmidFhMYKiZRGTOV9t0aMZaJ/EBgJDIzO0+eHJuJrKy57ZwnXaIGcp5CRQMMETm gGSKp9Mbmaw5bCjL3/9rzdXJXClMnikpQNdc0S9pd5u1QGQtCR2ssfOj6tRQuFB3YHQt huIuWvl6bz0g6ydR03uMTfkX7oQHhH8Qy4EibWdY1dUxZetXuJk+Cq84W2eFy1xoKHh4 fFqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSP6utNgEYYgdqZA7twMW1J8zY1gnP8FlX0PAXSkMHplhDHxkJ5ytISnHfpmIhp0Q== X-Received: by 10.28.17.198 with SMTP id 189mr1926991wmr.47.1455784616272; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.106] (163.170.63.188.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch. [188.63.170.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e14sm1802119wmi.21.2016.02.18.00.36.53 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:36:54 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: [Proposal] Concerning open PRs From: sebgoa In-Reply-To: <191A086B-88ED-42CE-958C-B3EBD1BF0D39@schubergphilis.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:36:50 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <191A086B-88ED-42CE-958C-B3EBD1BF0D39@schubergphilis.com> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) > On Feb 18, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Wilder Rodrigues = wrote: >=20 > Hi all, >=20 >=20 > It=E2=80=99s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;) >=20 > Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, = given the fact that few people, if any, are testing/merging them. I have = been a bit off the radar, but from next week I will start helping to get = some of those PRs tested and, hopefully, merged. >=20 > In order to get the community working as an unit, I would like to = propose the following: >=20 > * One should only create a PR after testing an existing PR. > - By testing I mean=E2=80=A6 testing. Not just looking into it and = saying =E2=80=9CLGTM=E2=80=9D. Manual tests should also count, with = screenshots attached to the PR. >=20 > That will make those with test environment pitch in and help, and in = addition might also decrease the frenzy for creating PRs which = occasionally won=E2=80=99t be tested within a month time - or longer. >=20 > For others not creating PRs that often, like me, we should help = testing at least 1 PR per week. >=20 > Being a bit more blunt now, if a PR is created but the person does not = contribute with testing an existing one, the new PR should be closed. >=20 > What do you think? >=20 That sounds too extreme to my taste. Bottom line, folks who submit PR need to stay on top of them and address = comments. But then we need to have that CI in place -sebastien > Cheers, > Wilder