Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E93418536 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83558 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2016 16:37:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 83447 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2016 16:37:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 83061 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2016 16:37:05 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:37:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DED20C3C90; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:37:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=li.nux.ro Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LbiHQ2mskJmI; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org (mailserver.lastdot.org [31.193.175.196]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1BC262050A; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84D42E6E57; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:36:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mailserver.lastdot.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id vSEibdLidlzU; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:36:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9083B2E6E5A; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:36:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mailserver.lastdot.org 9083B2E6E5A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=li.nux.ro; s=C605E3A6-F3C6-11E3-AEB0-DFF9218DCAC4; t=1452616606; bh=SfWpzQqsroW0LSz56xFwOM0nYwJWWky4w+PrwPOvvGg=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EW1s3e2VnLvUg0U7Y6ZzyC27BTXWo+IjYeZwzK8MRtR19iZkBw6VqMpNmE4S8yqnW MfV0B50BxuOEv/ns/S+adAXhLVQzrfZ6CCaf6TBanJubE0bO6Cc/W7r2dRULh9dEa+ KmfFE8btYDrqYGANjKF/Z3DSqzlYB5+7n/NsROrs= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailserver.lastdot.org Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mailserver.lastdot.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id FYphTqWLliI6; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:36:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org (mailserver.lastdot.org [31.193.175.196]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CCE2E6E59; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:36:46 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:36:45 +0000 (GMT) From: Nux! To: private@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, users@cloudstack.apache.org, marketing@cloudstack.apache.org Message-ID: <600318588.13750.1452616605546.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> In-Reply-To: <6DED023B-B730-43E0-8376-49C7595375FD@gmail.com> References: <6DED023B-B730-43E0-8376-49C7595375FD@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Thoughts on Citrix announcement yesterday MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1191 (ZimbraWebClient - FF38 (Linux)/8.6.0_GA_1191) Thread-Topic: Thoughts on Citrix announcement yesterday Thread-Index: XBVhE3IGvRKBPGpDl6FyJPTV/OKjkA== Hi Sebastien, Thanks for your thoughts! I for one am being optimistic about this change. I'm also not worried about containers, I think you've spent too much time a= mong hammers and now everything looks like a nail. :-) There is a massive load of stuff that at the moment needs (data centre) vir= tualisation and Cloudstack is in a better shape than ever to take care of t= hat. So long Citrix and thanks for all the fish! Hello Accelerite! My 2 pence, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastien Goasguen" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, users@cloudstack.apache.org, marketing@clo= udstack.apache.org, > private@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, 12 January, 2016 16:20:44 > Subject: Thoughts on Citrix announcement yesterday > Hi everyone (cross-posting), >=20 > Yesterday Citrix announced that it sold its CloudPlatform business to Acc= elerite > from Persistent Systems [1] >=20 > As you know CloudPlatform is Citrix=E2=80=99s commercial distribution of = Apache > CloudStack. I wanted to share a few thoughts on what this means for Cloud= Stack. >=20 > One of the core tenet of the Apache Software Foundation is non-affiliatio= n to > companies, as such all of us on these lists participate and contribute to > CloudStack as individuals. While the majority of us who are contributing = daily > to CloudStack are actually doing it as part of our day jobs we still voic= e our > opinions as individuals and companies do not (and should not) have influe= nce on > what we do. This is one of the things that makes ASF great. This is also = one of > the reasons why the ASF and us as a project will not comment on this > announcement. It is Citrix=E2=80=99s business, not ours. >=20 > That said, Citrix gave CloudStack to the ASF back in 2012 and contributed > heavily in the early days to its development and maintenance. We should b= e > thankful to Citrix for donating this software and helping the community g= row. > Giving it to the ASF was also the move that allows us to keep on going li= ke > =E2=80=9Cbusiness=E2=80=9D as usual. We as a project do not depend on Cit= rix. Hence Citrix > selling its CloudPlatform business does not change our day to day. >=20 > Over the years it is fair to say that Citrix involvement through the many > individuals participating on these lists as diminished, with the vast maj= ority > of the work now carried on by others. If we were to do a ASF =E2=80=9Cfau= x-pas=E2=80=9D and > actually check affiliation of the folks that are doing most of the develo= pment > and release work, we would see other companies than Citrix. Companies off= ering > CloudStack services but also and mostly CloudStack users, a few doing it = as a > hobby and most because their company uses it. This is open source at its = core, > folks using a software, loving it, loving their peers, and contributing b= ack > for the benefit of everyone. >=20 > It is impossible for me to say what Accelerite will do, I have had no con= tact > with them so far and did not know this sale was coming. Neither do I know= what > will happen to all the fine Citrix engineers that were still working on > CloudStack. Whatever they do, I wish them the best and thank them for the > dedication to our project over the years. Early indication from the press > release seems to indicate that Accelerite will engage with us. If they do= , we > will welcome them like any contributors to an ASF project. With openness, > transparency and respect (the Apache way). >=20 > I do want to mention that I think this may be an opportunity for CloudSta= ck. > Observers might think that our project is dead because of Citrix selling = its > business, but they would be mis-informed about the nature of ASF projects= . I > actually believe the contrary and think this will be a time where more us= ers > and potentially companies will engage more actively. They will see that t= he > route to a successful Cloud is through engaging and becoming part of our > community. They will also finally stop thinking that CloudStack is a Citr= ix > product and that might be the kicker that brings them on board. >=20 > Finally, being a technical guy, I like to focus on technical things. We h= ave > done some great strides over the past 8 months, we have stabilized CloudS= tack > and are now releasing faster than ever, we have dockerized, we have plugi= nized, > we have had several events... In september we will go to Brazil for CCC. = Brazil > is seeing a huge growth in CloudStack adoption. >=20 > We still have a ton to do, from removing technical debt, fixing security = issues, > improving packaging, making CloudStack ever more easier to develop and us= e. > This has not changed. We have some very important discussions going on ar= ound > LTS and GitHub hosting. If anything I think the container movement is a b= igger > threat to our project than Citrix=E2=80=99s announcement. As companies st= art to embrace > the container ecosystem and building containerized applications, what hap= pens > to CloudStack ? How does CloudStack work in a container world ? The same > question are valid for OpenStack by the way, I just don=E2=80=99t buy int= o the Magnum > effort, but I digress :) >=20 > So thank you Citrix, we hope to welcome Accelerite and let=E2=80=99s keep= on Stacking, >=20 > [1] > https://www.citrix.com/blogs/2016/01/11/a-new-home-accelerite-to-acquire-= cloudplatform/ >=20 > -Sebastien > VP Apache CloudStack