cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Abhinandan Prateek <abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSE] Dynamic inter VPC routing
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:06:23 GMT
Erik,

Updated the doc to reflect that the CIDR partitioning is not rigid.





[ShapeBlue]<http://www.shapeblue.com>
Abhinandan Prateek
Software Architect      ,       ShapeBlue


d:       | s: +44 203 603 0540<tel:|%20s:%20+44%20203%20603%200540>      |      m: 
    +91 970 11 99011<tel:+91%20970%2011%2099011>

e:      abhinandan.prateek@shapeblue.com | t: <mailto:abhinandan.prateek@shapeblue.com%20|%20t:>
        |      w:      www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>

a:      53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden London WC2N 4HS UK


[cid:image30a874.png@4d1f2b2d.4285da73]


Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India
LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic
of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered
trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use
of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe
you have received this email in error.




On 05/01/16, 9:17 PM, "Erik Weber" <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Abhinandan Prateek <
>abhinandan.prateek@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Currently the inter VPC traffic has to go thru the public gateway.
>> This means the traffic has to be nat-ed across public internet via
>> core-routers, which is inefficient in itself. A more efficient approach
>> will be to route the traffic locally.
>>
>> The proposal is to enable quagga- ospf on VPC routers so that the
>> traffic between VPC’s is routed efficiently.
>>
>> The design doc is here:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Dynamically+routed+VPC
>>
>>
>
>Regarding Super-CIDRs it states that a Super-CIDR will be divided into /24
>and /27s, but it is unclear to me if this is hard coded or just an example.
>
>What if a user wants to use /26 as their Tier-network within a /16
>Super-CIDR?
>
>
>--
>Erik
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services:
IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> |
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> | CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
| CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/related (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message