cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From DaanHoogland <>
Subject [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9106 - As a Developer I want t...
Date Sun, 06 Dec 2015 08:14:38 GMT
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
    --- Diff: plugins/network-elements/ovs/src/com/cloud/network/element/ ---
    @@ -488,50 +494,54 @@ public boolean applyPFRules(final Network network, final List<PortForwardingRule
                 return true;
    -        DataCenterVO dcVO = _dcDao.findById(network.getDataCenterId());
    -        NetworkTopology networkTopology = _networkTopologyContext.retrieveNetworkTopology(dcVO);
    -        return networkTopology.applyFirewallRules(network, rules, routers);
    +        final DataCenterVO dcVO = _dcDao.findById(network.getDataCenterId());
    +        final NetworkTopology networkTopology = _networkTopologyContext.retrieveNetworkTopology(dcVO);
    +        for (final DomainRouterVO domainRouterVO : routers) {
    +            result = networkTopology.applyFirewallRules(network, rules, domainRouterVO);
    --- End diff --
    Sorry, i did not notice. Where did you say that?
    I saw some other places where you bail on the first fail. I don't like that solution:
    If the first fails nothing is applied.
    If the second fails the first router has the rules applied.
    with &= it is symmetrical.

If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.

View raw message