Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B935518039 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70807 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2015 13:18:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 70616 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2015 13:18:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 70577 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2015 13:18:51 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:18:51 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 8ABB4E1083; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:18:49 +0000 (UTC) From: pdion891 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] cloudstack-www pull request: downloads: State packages on download... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20151125131849.8ABB4E1083@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/20#issuecomment-159605020 With all respect to shapeblue team, contributions and efforts, -1 with this current PR. Adding "official" in the source section doesn't make sense. This is the main site of the project, it's expected to be the official releases. For third party repos, I don't think apt-get.eu repos should be listed there as it's maintain by the cloudstack community not a single entity such as shapeblue one. shapeblue could be listed in a third party section, but why a shapeblue repo, how different it is compare to the community one or event Citrix cloudplatform. Then why cloudplatform would not be listed there too? So far, I saw lots of confusion introduced in all the documentation regarding repo urls because urls keep swapping between shapeblue.com and cloudstack.apt-get.eu between release. It make documentation a bit weird and look like an unstable project. I don't think shapeblue.com repos should be listed in the general cloudstack documentation, but can be listed in a "third party distributions" section of the download page. I don't see shapeblue.com repo as a community repo but as a vendor repo, as oppose to cloudstack.apt-get.eu which is a community driven repo not backed by a vendor. Maybe we could have download page heading like this?: ```

Source Release

Community Packages

Third-Party Distributions

``` --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---