cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Package Repositories
Date Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:41:53 GMT
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Paul Angus <paul.angus@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> Doesn't that meant that we'll have to vote on the source and the packaged
> rpms/debs otherwise they we have no official community standing. ?
>
​I am not sure how we can give them official standing yet but we are the
apache foundation​, so we vote on source. I would say we vote on the
packaging software from a different repo then the core+plugins and
automatically update a repo from that one. The repo will not be endorsed
but the way it is filled will be.

my €0,02 of future dreams


-----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> Sent: 27 November 2015 09:36
> To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Package Repositories
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Paul Angus <paul.angus@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> > So. My understanding is that to make the packages in the repo 'official'
> > they must be voted on.  -- would we make the packages what we vote on,
> > rather that the source code (bearing in mind you can't separate the
> > packaging in that case).   IMHO, it'll make testing a whole lot simpler
> for
> > folks if there is just no requirement to build from source.
> >
>
> ​We will not stop voting on the source! Any vote on -, or otherwise
> handling of packages is a separate thing.​
>


-- 
Daan

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message