cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nux! <...@li.nux.ro>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0
Date Wed, 04 Nov 2015 16:22:53 GMT
That's great, thanks a lot! Saves on time and confusion. If we could do this with every (rc)
release, that'd be great.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rajani Karuturi" <Rajani.Karuturi@citrix.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 16:17:10
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

> I started jenkins builds for cloudstack RPM packages and systemvm templates for
> this branch here
> 
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm-packages-with-branch-parameter/19/console
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parameterized-sytemvm/3/console
> 
> We can use them once the build is complete.
> 
> ~Rajani
> 
> On 04-Nov-2015, at 8:58 PM, Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro<mailto:nux@li.nux.ro>> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Has jenkins built rpms for this somewhere?
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro>
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Remi Bergsma" <RBergsma@schubergphilis.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 14:55:11
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a
> vote:
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.0-RC20151104T1522
> 
> Commit: b0ebe68e375432b28eef031ab62ccd5831234c77
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Mime
View raw message