Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 826BF1773A for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7347 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2015 07:36:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 7283 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2015 07:36:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 7261 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2015 07:36:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:36:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 04D6E1A2053; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:36:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-lL58L7PE_V; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8BD5D20DB9; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lamp12 with SMTP id p12so121781703lam.0; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:36:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=TzgZQeYWTZGC+zty4PCvb8+rWenBl/hDSGtfHIwZ/N4=; b=MWT4Cg2TZI96Os4c3MhybwRxytY7QyUNd/XJN0u6m7JDYUr6G8zHkaSUPX5BDf0M/R ptyiqImbV+TsMJabteH5CAnRNHv90TAk/cxD46a92/fbV4Tej8J1kv+iRTP0wja0yi7Z ArStiQtT/KzDZlO1U7FlgMJfWA4BpPUO/wSatGlddLJz7lcX5ndNQwLw5UUNRSaLADpX 1hXwKUZciNr2cijTTOdGuNKbY1gskiFVU/4FGXPvBVQQc6jEVjzs1J6XsRA+Oh3Xnt9c uwkoFDIIu6SC+CukwosTLWHOjeIm8DPEn2usRThUQylBxN/fjA/ZwkMjPKqJInxOEgs+ 19Dg== X-Received: by 10.112.159.72 with SMTP id xa8mr13584630lbb.118.1442388986581; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:36:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.11.138 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:36:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Daan Hoogland Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:36:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]missing power state reports from hypervisors on VMs ([BLOCKER]?) To: dev , "users@cloudstack.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c285ca2c5966051fd85b6f --001a11c285ca2c5966051fd85b6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ladies and gentlemen, A ticket was entered by Rene Moser [1] on the way ACS handles missing power state reports. His issue is that VMs ma at times be regarded as off while they are registered as running and actually running as well. The missing report has to be handled in some way so right now it is handled as if the VM is down. I made a PR [2] that does minimal handling by only logging the fact. This seems an improvement but I have no idea if it is and how to test it. so two questions: - is this a blocker? - is the ignoring after logging the appropriate way to handle this? I would be very pleased with all and any of your opinions. regards, [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8848 =E2=80=8B[2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/829=E2=80=8B --=20 Daan --001a11c285ca2c5966051fd85b6f--