Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 855EA178DD for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92463 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2015 11:59:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 92406 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2015 11:59:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 92394 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2015 11:59:34 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:59:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 53AACC084E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:59:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jsA027hA5rTi for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com (mail-la0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 99CCC42B0A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lahg1 with SMTP id g1so29386703lah.1 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 04:59:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ea7mu//09aV/ctC4VMQIS1hvObtu4FTKARufy9NkFqA=; b=Hj8Q70/54qp63pDgLWSBgjpFOFGYFKbnndxAzmp4K9AWTjdxskcV+Qh8VEM88c1F+g Ah9EtAs6SkzVCJUwA4IlYAzL2FoFK4FQevhVyG9NM2JQr5aocyUfB2ErHtM4r/EVO6qI hB/8LIb319SG/225PBS4ymZALBUaONHJWvD63RP40M7y122gDlEbg5jYitQFDpWRKuHq gWXwqWkL6+k/zHLFLfBMcAmU2K/x98dFD+4rb/g0uaB3ui/OxutedW/B8dfcXdsx1iAa queEFdV4qBf+vLnL0j+1QgpJBlr3a0OLpj1vOjRF9Unhz4E6oXxnIqlww5pUTLF5BRTp dFKg== X-Received: by 10.112.159.72 with SMTP id xa8mr2856064lbb.118.1442577566402; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 04:59:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.11.138 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 04:59:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <93238155381A8343BD3FFE2CB75BC9E723B5D12B@SINPEX01CL01.citrite.net> References: <93238155381A8343BD3FFE2CB75BC9E723B5D12B@SINPEX01CL01.citrite.net> From: Daan Hoogland Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:59:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal to get to 100% passrate on BVTs To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c285ca680fc205200443ae --001a11c285ca680fc205200443ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Raja, great initiative. I don't think we should wait with the back out part unitll we are at 100%. We can start backing out any commit that reduces the pass rate in any way right now. =E2=82=AC0,02 On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Raja Pullela wrote: > Hi, > > We have been having steady rate of blocker issues/breakages. I am > proposing to see if we can get to a 100% passrate on BVTs by next Friday, > Sep 25th or sooner. > > Once we reach 100% passrate, we should closely monitor BVTs and back out > commits that we think have broken BVTs. > I will report the BVTs passrate on a daily basis. Also, working with > Kishan to see a way to make the data available online? > > Here is the latest status on the BVTs - > XS Basic - 93% / CLOUDSTACK-8843< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843> (in the process of > testing Jayapal's fix), > XS Adv - 81.8% / CLOUDSTACK-8881< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8881>, CLOUDSTACK-8697< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8697> > > KVM Basic - Deployment failure / CLOUDSTACK-8883< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8883> > > KVM Adv - Deployment failure / CLOUDSTACK-8883< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8883>, CLOUDSTACK-8881< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8881>, CLOUDSTACK-8697 > > BTW - currently, no one has picked up CLOUDSTACK-8883< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8883> yet, > > best, > Raja > > --=20 Daan --001a11c285ca680fc205200443ae--