Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A073D185F5 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82219 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2015 15:38:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 82162 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2015 15:38:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 82150 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2015 15:38:57 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:38:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 82E2AC7C20 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:38:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.12 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.12 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wRhFQiRICLwH for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E749442B5D for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so202711377wic.0 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:38:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0cN3X9HVjQcyAaMqc5RJGW+dBVkhCghq0JkdbybC/gI=; b=Yboxhg8xW4Lzc8cP5bCQJdGchxoJGDUGvf46dZnd6bYN2GYphu+b8CA2i6uDVNTpnl F2pVZz9HSBIQRN1mRSpUN9cAVobgFNptIc+gFxLT66dcUSRYjL13ds/sAhpxBaAmFIi9 hDTpU1AaqyjDBa1dNApvEq/NLIPT6Z/ri6gm1DcBkgIPGotuepKfJH2FANVOMmEPaFPi NWEfSeDSw8mLlmATJX/KfP8N43LmkN+otQRnlh7oxkZhf+U5LqnTUsECdXbmFdSNzn// XTvUxHzcJUvN1qCOPQE8bzvoxwdkgRJtKI6jjohA1jj914ux30UdMhT8CGv1Qh6odzeg yraQ== X-Received: by 10.194.112.162 with SMTP id ir2mr5668270wjb.40.1443627522344; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.105] (229.194.193.178.dynamic.wline.res.cust.swisscom.ch. [178.193.194.229]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t7sm30210237wib.1.2015.09.30.08.38.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: OVS documentation From: Sebastien Goasguen In-Reply-To: <560BEF9E.8050008@artifact-software.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:38:41 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3F9D77EC-E4F1-4A1C-8514-F04324DAA6D8@gmail.com> References: <560A2A2D.8030207@artifact-software.com> <560A7EC7.7040707@artifact-software.com> <560BEF9E.8050008@artifact-software.com> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) > On Sep 30, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Ron Wheeler = wrote: >=20 > On 30/09/2015 6:33 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >>> On Sep 29, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Ron Wheeler = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Can someone fix this? >>>=20 >> Honestly Ron, the issue is that very few people are actually using = the GRE isolation. >>=20 >> One would need to test it with the latest cloudstack 4.5.2 and latest = OVS to see if it works with newer versions=E2=80=A6. > Any suggestions about what to say or is it best left "as is" >> -sebastien >>=20 >>> Does anyone know what the correct recommendation should be? >>>=20 >>> Is anyone interested in the documentation? >> Of course... > Sorry if that seemed rhetorical. > I was hoping to find an actual volunteer to work with or to help point = me to areas that are known to need editing. >=20 >>=20 >>> I am trying to read it all with an outsider's eye and identify areas = that I have trouble understanding. >>> Is it customary to use the Dev list or just create JIRA Issues. >>>=20 >> for questions from the user side, usually it=E2=80=99s better to hit = the users@ list. >> But you can create JIRA issues as well, if it=E2=80=99s an error. >>=20 >> Ideally, once you test it on newer versions, you can also submit a = github PR to make the required change in the docs. We will happily = merge. >=20 > I am not sure what you mean by testing. I mean actually deploying a GRE based network for cloudstack. That way = you will know if it works with the latest version of centos and OVS. > I am probably going to limit my efforts to editing and will depend on = others to suggest content and verify the accuracy of changes since I am = too new to CloudStack and do not have a CloudStack test environment to = use for testing. Maybe you could try to deploy it on one node, that will help you = understand and check the docs. >=20 >>=20 >>> Ron >>>=20 >>> On 29/09/2015 2:18 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: >>>> Dear Ron, >>>>=20 >>>> It's old I believe. >>>>=20 >>>> --Tuna >>>>=20 >>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Ron Wheeler = > = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> = http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/networking/ovs-plugin.html >>>> has the following sentence: >>>> "CentOS 6.4 and OpenvSwitch 1.10 are recommended." These seem to >>>> be very old. Are they really the recommended versions? >>>>=20 >>>> Ron >>>>=20 >>>> -- Ron Wheeler >>>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Ron Wheeler > President > Artifact Software Inc > email: rwheeler@artifact-software.com > skype: ronaldmwheeler > phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102