Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: creategui@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPpf5a0MCdoCZd9XD1XRwm8d0VGTE4e35bVCPOVC+W0D7YUXaQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <D2BE47B7-FA35-4CE7-A702-36D13FEBDA38@gmail.com>
	<CAKprHVbyVUYmOXDcFs_Bg2TMif7OM-TjVagGRW8JpXLKAHa07g@mail.gmail.com>
	<9E20AE2C-16DE-4039-BAB0-64D7FA017E8B@gmail.com>
	<5EC1E9B5-D543-4E3A-8796-B40D049D845F@citrix.com>
	<CAMbNGRUX-yEo1Mu_MLLiixD=viXFOD_x2KSV5RVhuetMuH6n2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpf5a0MCdoCZd9XD1XRwm8d0VGTE4e35bVCPOVC+W0D7YUXaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:47:30 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAMbNGRVNO8iNZv1mF43h49zPrtbxJn1ySZcQM6MQcV+j_PX0mg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack EC2stack 0.8.0
From: Carlos Reategui <carlos@reategui.com>
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134f37a8a6a6b051e62adeb

--001a1134f37a8a6a6b051e62adeb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hmm.  not sure.  I am running:
- ACS 4.5.1
- ec2stack 0.7.1 (on MS installed using pip)

I have tested from:
- MacOS 10.10.5 using aws cli 1.7.47 (installed using brew)
- Ubuntu 14.04 using aws cli 1.3.8 and 1.8.0 (installed using pip)

And it works, although I am using profiles but that shouldn't make a
difference:
aws ec2 --profile sjocs --endpoint=3Dhttp://sjocloudstack.local:5000
describe-instances


On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Carlos,
> I have the signature fix and config looks like below. I also checked that
> the keys are correct.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 20:53 PM, Carlos Reategui <carlos@reategui.com>
> wrote:
>
> Rajani,
> Take a look at your ~/.aws/config and make sure the keys are correct.  Al=
so
> is you are using a current version of the AWS CLI make sure to add the
> signature_version block as mentioned in the ec2stack readme.
>
> From the above looks like you are not using profiles therefore your confi=
g
> file should look something like this:
>
>
> [default]
>
> output =3D json
>
> region =3D
>
> aws_access_key_id =3D xxxxxxxxxx
>
> aws_secret_access_key =3D yyyyyyyyy
>
> ec2 =3D
>
>     signature_version =3D v2
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Carlos
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Rajani Karuturi <
> Rajani.Karuturi@citrix.com
> <javascript:;>
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi Sebastien,
> >
> > I am trying to configure and use ec2stack. This is what I have done
> >
> > $ pip install awscli
> > $ cd cloudstack-ec2stack
> > $ python setup.py install
> > $ ec2stack-configure
> > $ ec2stack &
> > $ ec2stack-register http://localhost:5000 cs_api_key cs_secret_key
> > $ aws ec2 describe-images --endpoint=3Dhttp://localhost:5000
> > # it gave the below error message
> > # Unable to locate credentials. You can configure credentials by runnin=
g
> > "aws configure=E2=80=9D.
> > $ aws configure # gave AWS api and secret key
> > $ aws ec2 describe-images --endpoint=3Dhttp://localhost:5000
> > # this is the output I see
> > # localhost - - [28/Aug/2015 16:25:24] "POST / HTTP/1.1" 401 -
> > # =E2=80=98RequestID=E2=80=99
> >
> > I don=E2=80=99t see anything in cloudstack logs
> >
> > If I change the api key and secret key to
> > $ ec2stack-register http://localhost:5000 aws_api_key aws_secret_key
> >
> > I see below in cloudstack logs
> >
> > 2015-08-28 16:22:37,118 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
> > (1188257713@qtp-2099531272-3:ctx-29d29342) =3D=3D=3DSTART=3D=3D=3D  10.=
147.28.40 --
> > GET
> >
>
> apikey=3Daws_api_key&command=3DlistTemplates&listAll=3Dtrue&response=3Djs=
on&templatefilter=3Dexecutable&signature=3D6OggS6Zb2vbejw60BbFbYhaiEEY%3D
> > 2015-08-28 16:22:37,120 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer]
> > (1188257713@qtp-2099531272-3:ctx-29d29342 ctx-574b2cf4) apiKey does not
> > map to a valid user -- ignoring request, apiKey:aws_api_key
> > 2015-08-28 16:22:37,122 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
> > (1188257713@qtp-2099531272-3:ctx-29d29342 ctx-574b2cf4) =3D=3D=3DEND=3D=
=3D=3D
> > 10.147.28.40 -- GET
> >
>
> apikey=3Daws_api_key&command=3DlistTemplates&listAll=3Dtrue&response=3Djs=
on&templatefilter=3Dexecutable&signature=3D6OggS6Zb2vbejw60BbFbYhaiEEY%3D
> >
> >
> > where are the logs for ec2stack? how can I see what it is happening?
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> >
> >
> > On 27-Aug-2015, at 12:54 am, sebgoa <runseb@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Aug 26, 2015, at 7:08 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding)
> > >>
> > >> sigs and hashes look good.
> > >> builds fine
> > >> no binaries present.
> > >> A few files seem to be missing license headers, but I don't think it=
's
> > >> a blocker.
> > >> License and NOTICE appear to be correct.
> > >>
> > >> I wish we pointed to the cloudstack docker hub account rather than t=
he
> > >> runseb account, but don't think it's a blocker for release
> > >>
> > >
> > > missed that, now fixed.
> > >
> > >> --David
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:25 AM, sebgoa <runseb@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>>
> > >>> I've created a 0.8.0 release of EC2stack, with the following
> artifacts
> > up for a vote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=3Dcloudstack-ec2stack.git
> > >>>
> > >>> Commit: a61d7c01129dfe4c31515a48e0f6b4a53436c208
> > >>>
> > >>> There are no code changes from the time the code was donated to the
> > ASF, only license headers and a Dockerfile.
> > >>>
> > >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > >>> location):
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/ec2stack-0.8.0/
> > >>>
> > >>> PGP release keys (signed using 8F89EB84):
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> For testing functionality you might consider using the Docker image=
:
> > >>> docker pull cloudstack/cloudstack-ec2stack
> > >>>
> > >>> Do remember that the official release artifact is the source code,
> > which needs to contain proper licensing and proper signatures.
> > >>>
> > >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1  approve
> > >>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> > >>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -
> Sent from Windows Phone
> ~Rajani
>

--001a1134f37a8a6a6b051e62adeb--