Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E069188AC for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65967 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2015 16:06:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 65933 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2015 16:06:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 65922 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2015 16:06:35 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 16:06:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4DBB7C2135 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:06:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JQBGpElQ9j-W for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sbppmx2.schubergphilis.com (sbppmx2.schubergphilis.com [195.66.90.56]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BD960210DF for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sbppmx2.schubergphilis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A927C12B55 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:06:16 +0200 (MEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at schubergphilis.com Received: from sbppmx2.schubergphilis.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sbppmx2.schubergphilis.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rp3zTeZz5XEp for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:06:16 +0200 (MEST) Received: from SBPOTMG101.sbp.lan (edge.schubergphilis.com [195.66.90.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sbppmx2.schubergphilis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF7712924 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:06:16 +0200 (MEST) Received: from SBPOMF402.sbp.lan (10.71.2.133) by SBPOTMG101.sbp.lan (10.71.3.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:06:16 +0200 Received: from SBPOMB402.sbp.lan ([fe80::2410:c2c8:67bf:d067]) by SBPOMF402.sbp.lan ([fe80::2c87:4702:f9df:837e%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:06:16 +0200 From: Remi Bergsma To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] cleanup repo Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] cleanup repo Thread-Index: AQHQzSmpq5eTe+og1EuvJAFZEdCaBp36UMoA Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:06:14 +0000 Message-ID: <7F09532B-1B77-4C84-844B-944021907DA6@schubergphilis.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.200.6.81] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6C7983E21ABA1E44BBD28D5821CD2E27@schubergphilis.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 +1 > On 02 Aug 2015, at 15:46, Daan Hoogland wrote: >=20 > As we are changing our review process I want to clean up the > repository at apache getting rid of stale branches. Of course the > release branches of old releases should stay, but a lot of old > branches have been merged at unknown places in the master or old > release branches. I want to propose to delete them as much as > possible. >=20 > - I want to delete any branch that has no commits newer then one year old > - I want to ask the last commiter on any branch with commits newer > then one year to review if 'their' branch can be removed > - All branches that are merged back are to remain untouched. >=20 > ideally only the branches 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and master will > remain as branches HEAD. This is unfortunately not true for some older > releases that were never merged back into their respective release > branches. Any work in progress will of course not be touched. >=20 > comments? > --=20 > Daan