cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From karuturi <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8648: Do not configure the Ima...
Date Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:45:44 GMT
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/606#issuecomment-123278333
  
    while I agree with the code change based on the current implementations of getVirtualSize,
should we just pass the storage layer in the params so that any new implementation if required
can use the storage layer?
    ```
    Map<String, Object> params = new HashMap<String, Object>();
    params.put(StorageLayer.InstanceConfigKey, _storage);
    processor.configure("template processor", new HashMap<String, Object>());
    ```



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Mime
View raw message