Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14BCA51C-01BC-42C0-B236-4A53A0520F7E@isg.si>
References: <A1A90E4D-5202-4906-A9E8-6BF1B767F3DE@isg.si>
 <CAPpf5a3-jcXdhkc8NQ0F6MEHvfoW7zPAaGA1Wn5jLH414sK9yQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <14BCA51C-01BC-42C0-B236-4A53A0520F7E@isg.si>
From: Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:55:03 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAPpf5a0QKDTjfjMgicSmJbz-Nj1btGoXqs4kdHPFxAkqyN9QEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Which 4.3.2 CS build to use? Shapeblue's version or build from
 official repos?
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111b2a2e7b9f7051969fec7

--089e0111b2a2e7b9f7051969fec7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I havent used any of them. So, I could not recommend anyone.

Building from source code [1] is the best way. As you would be in sync with
community in terms of releases and issues. Taking a precompiled version
doesnt guarantee if its the release that is voted by this community and
makes it difficult to report an issue or get a fix for it from the
community.

Thats my personal opinion and I understand that many prefer rpms/debs.


[1] https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html

~Rajani

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:46 PM, France <mailinglists@isg.si> wrote:

> Tnx for response Rajani, it is greatly appreciated.
>
> You are correct, I do not know how i missed out, 4.3.2 in official repos.
> Probably due to too much work. :-)
>
> However your response in regards of which to choose, does not really help
> me. I have decided none the less, to use additionally patched build from
> Shapeblue.
> Unless someone warns me about potential problems with their patches, we
> will stick to my decision for this weekends upgrade.
>
> Regards,
> F.
>
> On 25 Jun 2015, at 06:01, Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > you can use anything as long as it works for you.
> > AFAIK, packages on apt-get.eu are created from the point where RC is
> voted
> > and they do have 4.3.2 in the link you mentioned above.
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, France <mailinglists@isg.si> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> we will upgrade CS 4.3.1 (from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/)
> to
> >> 4.3.2 this weekend.
> >>
> >> In official repos: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/ there is no
> >> 4.3.2.
> >> There is some build in Shapeblue=E2=80=99s repo:
> >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/centos/4.3/
> >> and they also provide additionally pached build via:
> >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/
> >>
> >> Is there any reason not to choose their patched version and change the
> yum
> >> repository?
> >>
> >> Tnx for info.
> >> Regards,
> >> F.
> >>
> >>
>
>

--089e0111b2a2e7b9f7051969fec7--