cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4
Date Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:22:28 GMT
:) please do - send the patch.

Thanks Rafael

On 1 June 2015 at 15:16, Rafael Fonseca <rsafonseca@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrija,
>
> The first fix i had proposed might not have been a problem, besides the
> security issue.
> I have now updated the PR to fix the security issue, but tests for other
> authentication methods must be performed before a merge.
> I think Rohit is looking into testing the SAML plugin with it, if it's ok i
> guess it can be merged, if not, it will still have to be made compatible
> with those auth plugins.
> If you'd like i can give you a small patch to fix session management in
> your environment, you can patch in place after installation, so easy to do
> :)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Daan, Rafael,
> >
> > what about Rafael's https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/308 - it
> > need
> > to be reviewsed by security time - fine, but can we merge this, and undo
> > alter, if necessary ?
> >
> > On 1 June 2015 at 14:26, Rafael Fonseca <rsafonseca@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Daan,
> > > I've also created a PR for fixing a couple of deb packaging issues for
> > 4.4
> > > Have a look here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/339
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Erik Weber <terbolous@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds reasonable to me.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Erik
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > If no objections I will reset the default to 4.4.1 (the lowest
> > required
> > > > > version) include Rafaels pr for kvm/centos packaging and create a
> new
> > > rc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:54 schreef Daan Hoogland <
> > > > daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > So we will have to include an update in every release and we
will
> > > > > probably
> > > > > > forget about that pretty soon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:49 schreef Remi Bergsma <remi@remi.nl>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I'd say, as a default: 4.4.0 will be nice for any 4.4.x
release,
> > and
> > > > > 4.5.0
> > > > > >> for 4.5.x etc. This is also close to what was hard-coded
before.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Remi
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 2015-06-01 11:33 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Guess we'll be making a new rc. The value can be 0.0.0
for my
> > > part,
> > > > it
> > > > > >> must
> > > > > >> > be an operator decision to set the MinVRVersion if
it must be
> > > > higher.
> > > > > It
> > > > > >> > will always be an upgrade matter and any seeded template
> should
> > be
> > > > > >> accepted
> > > > > >> > as per the installation notes. Of course the other
side of the
> > > issue
> > > > > is
> > > > > >> > whether a version will work at all. The operator can
create a
> > > > version
> > > > > of
> > > > > >> > the template with their own versioning scheme, however.
I
> should
> > > be
> > > > > >> writing
> > > > > >> > all this in another {DISCUSS]-thread.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > cancelling the RC to add code for Bruno's requirement.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 08:35 schreef Milamber <
> > milamber@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Please note: I my case, there isn't an upgrade,
I have the
> > issue
> > > > > with
> > > > > >> > > 4.4.3 or 4.4.4 fresh installation (out of the
box, from git
> > tag
> > > > > >> > > 4.4-RC20150529T2004)
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On 01/06/2015 07:22, Erik Weber wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > If it means that all upgrades are unable
to do VR related
> > > tasks
> > > > (
> > > > > >> > > starting
> > > > > >> > > > VMs for one.. ), I'd call that regression
and redo.
> > > > > >> > > > Relying on all our users to do manual fixing
just because
> we
> > > > don't
> > > > > >> want
> > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > >> > > > call off the RC is bad IMHO.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message