Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73BA017975 for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 05:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48225 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2015 05:11:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 48161 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2015 05:11:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 48147 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2015 05:11:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 May 2015 05:11:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0B6561828F8 for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 05:11:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.898 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9fEqPeNNLWI6 for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 05:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2598442B0E for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 05:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so53690509igb.0 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 22:10:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=G9tWXv0w4jisk496bpOthR4R+GDnDbMGWwejulT49f0=; b=wYIPvx3nW5F4R8EhSWjn0spH+qlElMS+I9tKQwbHZIh6ArPccWKle4WIVH2AuvpJ4R 5lkvqTBTQUfI7t1rERerkido4rA8Hufou7aKmJegMkyxEPPOO+3qqVmz9eKJ32B2lOFS fkzdsjw4V5TB18eVCp2HL+RAg0UvIahyy7QIro9+eREKqthM50Q9/+fb8KBQFmqp3VVj TQpCRjqJtHwPnlT6xbhs0uJtcAxueEAJqAiGCPTHM1ZKm40PUvyzUH+xQeVGIkk6dvXR /BaBRpZWTwuWr9hCoiyQPMqTPAQvnFoSBwpXnfW4ZFB0tbjgVJz4kDaMjlQ9bWjUNszN G8HA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.66.146 with SMTP id f18mr2439340igt.14.1431753027555; Fri, 15 May 2015 22:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.248.101 with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 22:10:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 10:40:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: usage-server redudancy ? From: Praveen B To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc09f69d355905162bfa79 --047d7bdc09f69d355905162bfa79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrija, Yes, it is always good to have redundant cloudstack-usage servers running on both of your management nodes. Also, this does not cause any problem for usage data aggregation. Thanks, Praveen On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: > Hi guys, > > wondering, is it possible/good to have redudant cloudstack-usage running = - > we have 2 acs mgmt nodes via LB, so can I run/install cloudstack-usage on > both nodes - does running 2 instances, makes problem for usage data > agregation etc ? > > THx > > -- > > Andrija Pani=C4=87 > --047d7bdc09f69d355905162bfa79--