Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Message-ID: <5551CBA0.8090805@widodh.nl>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 11:45:04 +0200
From: Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Repackaging / Distro support
References: 
 <CANpG1Oj=tiJ72hQZVLNqdEk2CnRQvf4f4bqb-0_Yc_CzF4PX4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP997UeHmbqsJNgh4U_vSD=HHGQaOywj-t_zvzHDy3+yy+xLZg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP997UeHmbqsJNgh4U_vSD=HHGQaOywj-t_zvzHDy3+yy+xLZg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 05/12/2015 11:37 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Rafael Fonseca
> <rsafonseca@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm reworking the packaging system in cloudstack, and would like
>> to gather your opinion on the following:
>> 
>> - Fedora 2x runs systemd's cockpit on port 9090 by default This
>> is a deal breaker for the cluster servlet port on this OS, the
>> two possibilities would be to either pack changes to fedora's
>> config on rpm install or simply change the servlet port to
>> another one that does not clash on any distro.. any
>> comments/suggestions?
>> 
>> - Tomcat is not listening on port 80 Tomcat is using port 8080,
>> which makes the user have to specify that in the browser.. should
>> we change it? In ubuntu it's already running under jsvc, so it
>> shouldn't be a problem.. same can be arranged for centos/other 
>> distros.
>> 
> 
> Is it possible to ask the user for this during installation and
> default to either 80 or 8080? I know Debian has a way to interact
> with the user during install, not sure about RedHat.
> 
> I don't know the rationale behind putting it on port 8080 in the
> first place, but personally I don't see a problem moving it to port
> 80.
> 

I'd say to stick to 8080 and recommend anybody to use Apache / Nginx
to proxy towards Tomcat.

> 
>> - No link on the tomcat root (http://management-server/ can link 
>> internally to http://management-server/client , this makes it
>> easier for new users who don't know the URL for the UI :)
>> 
>> 
> Sounds like a good idea to me, I always forget to add /client when
> I browse to new installations.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=pBnh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----