cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Swift 2.x as Secondary Storage - auth v2 ?
Date Tue, 26 May 2015 13:13:35 GMT
These are probably a bit early to use anywhere production, but they do look
interesting:
https://github.com/bouncestorage/swiftproxy
https://github.com/bouncestorage/s3proxy

-- 
Erik

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion@cloudops.com> wrote:

> S3 seams the have different behavior, ex:  download PCT status is display.
> I haven't extensively test but seams to work well,
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Guys, is using S3 for Secondary Storage any better supported in ACS in
> your
> > opinion? We plan to also try talking S3 to Swift, to see how that
> works...
> >
> > Thx
> >
> > On 26 May 2015 at 15:03, Erik Weber <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion@cloudops.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Andrija,
> > > >
> > > > Swift integration in cloudstack + XenServer require interaction from
> > > > Xenserver to initiate connection to Swift proxies,  this is made
> using
> > > > /etc/xapi.d/plugins/swiftxen which is a fairly old python script that
> > > only
> > > > support Swift api V1.  I've tried to upgrade that script which seams
> to
> > > be
> > > > a generic one from OpenStack, but the Python version running on
> > XenServer
> > > > Dom0 (XS 6.2) is too old to make the new script work :-S.  Maybe it
> > would
> > > > on XS 6.5 ?  I don't know if this would be easily fixed on KVM.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > XS 6.5 is still running CentOS 5 in Dom0, so I doubt it.
> > > Wait for the next release which is said to be based on CentOS 7.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Erik
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message