cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Swift 2.x as Secondary Storage - auth v2 ?
Date Tue, 26 May 2015 13:28:00 GMT
For the time being, we are looking into OSS solutions for the storage, but
will consider other stuff to.

Thx for sharing

On 26 May 2015 at 15:24, Erik Weber <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:

> If it's within your budget, we've had good results with NetApp and are
> happy to recommend it.
> I'm not responsible for configuring it, so I cannot say anything about how
> we do that, but we're using it's clustering abilities and haven't had any
> downtime on it.
>
> I believe the guys at Shuberg Philis also use NetApp(?)
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thx Erik, Interesting stuff :)
> >
> > We will test for now how Swift emulates S3 :)
> >
> > In general, we try to avoid single/multiply NFS boxes for SPOF and
> scaling
> > reasons, as Secondary Storage, so we are yet to come with good solution,
> > that works in ACS in nice fashion...
> >
> >
> > On 26 May 2015 at 15:13, Erik Weber <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > These are probably a bit early to use anywhere production, but they do
> > look
> > > interesting:
> > > https://github.com/bouncestorage/swiftproxy
> > > https://github.com/bouncestorage/s3proxy
> > >
> > > --
> > > Erik
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion@cloudops.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > S3 seams the have different behavior, ex:  download PCT status is
> > > display.
> > > > I haven't extensively test but seams to work well,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Andrija Panic <
> > andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Guys, is using S3 for Secondary Storage any better supported in ACS
> > in
> > > > your
> > > > > opinion? We plan to also try talking S3 to Swift, to see how that
> > > > works...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thx
> > > > >
> > > > > On 26 May 2015 at 15:03, Erik Weber <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <
> > pdion@cloudops.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Andrija,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Swift integration in cloudstack + XenServer require interaction
> > > from
> > > > > > > Xenserver to initiate connection to Swift proxies,  this
is
> made
> > > > using
> > > > > > > /etc/xapi.d/plugins/swiftxen which is a fairly old python
> script
> > > that
> > > > > > only
> > > > > > > support Swift api V1.  I've tried to upgrade that script
which
> > > seams
> > > > to
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > a generic one from OpenStack, but the Python version running
on
> > > > > XenServer
> > > > > > > Dom0 (XS 6.2) is too old to make the new script work :-S.
> Maybe
> > it
> > > > > would
> > > > > > > on XS 6.5 ?  I don't know if this would be easily fixed
on KVM.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > XS 6.5 is still running CentOS 5 in Dom0, so I doubt it.
> > > > > > Wait for the next release which is said to be based on CentOS
7.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Erik
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrija Panić
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message