cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Laszlo Hornyak <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Cloudstack Repackaging / Distro support
Date Tue, 12 May 2015 16:42:27 GMT
Hi Rafael,

There is a ticket for fedora packaging: CLOUDSTACK-8163 I have sent patches
with that issue ID. There are quite a lot of things to do...
Are you working on the management server packaging?
Why does the management service have to start as a separate service? It
could be just a webapp under tomcat.

Basically what are the advantages of having a reverse proxy in front of
tomcat? Is httpd/nginx more secure than tomcat?

Best regards,
Laszlo

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Rafael Fonseca <rsafonseca@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm reworking the packaging system in cloudstack, and would like to gather
> your opinion on the following:
>
> - Fedora 2x runs systemd's cockpit on port 9090 by default
>   This is a deal breaker for the cluster servlet port on this OS, the two
> possibilities would be to either pack changes to fedora's config on rpm
> install or simply change the servlet port to another one that does not
> clash on any distro.. any comments/suggestions?
>
> - Tomcat is not listening on port 80
>    Tomcat is using port 8080, which makes the user have to specify that in
> the browser.. should we change it? In ubuntu it's already running under
> jsvc, so it shouldn't be a problem.. same can be arranged for centos/other
> distros.
>
> - No link on the tomcat root (http://management-server/ can link
> internally
> to http://management-server/client , this makes it easier for new users
> who
> don't know the URL for the UI :)
>
> Thanks for your input :)
>



-- 

EOF

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message