cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francois Gaudreault <fgaudrea...@cloudops.com>
Subject Re: External LB integration
Date Wed, 27 May 2015 23:25:50 GMT
I dont think its configurable, maybe have a look in global settings?

We are using netscalers but in a VPC model. So we dont have to deal with
networkguru at all :)

FG
On May 27, 2015 5:57 PM, "Erik Weber" <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you Francois,
>
> Do you know if the subnets it considers are customizable somehow?
> As far as I could see it chose something completely random, which might not
> be a good thing.
>
> --
> Erik
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Francois Gaudreault <
> fgaudreault@cloudops.com> wrote:
>
> > Erik,
> >
> > Thats correct. Its called NetworkGuru. This is to avoid overlapping
> subnets
> > on a shared netscaler. Pretty sure if you use a dedicated one, youll have
> > more flexibility.
> >
> > FG
> > On May 27, 2015 4:30 PM, "Erik Weber" <terbolous@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Doing some tests with Netscaler at the moment (input welcome!), and
> > > discovered that if you have a network offering with external LB, you're
> > not
> > > allowed to specify the CIDR later when you add a network.
> > >
> > > Instead it seems to randomly pick a range, from I don't know where, and
> > use
> > > that.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know where this behaviour comes from? Why does CloudStack
> > think
> > > it is better at specifying a proper CIDR than me? Where is it getting
> > it's
> > > range from?
> > >
> > > The saga continues
> > >
> > > --
> > > Erik
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message