Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 334CE17B59 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 21:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57270 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2015 21:37:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 57208 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2015 21:37:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 57197 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2015 21:37:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 21:37:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.172] (HELO mail-ig0-f172.google.com) (209.85.213.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 21:37:41 +0000 Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so107781397igc.0 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 14:36:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JP3bVg0gsj4yAEEgcg94y3Y2gvyEeRWHew2aKgMc2cg=; b=dbGbMlJQHjjbiPmPR/FJDyyDmMh5w8VBxEqzQ/0azj6sIVfnVfoDuCBPQfsuHNUsu8 xfNbBXR0d55+gzzvrD5zO+soU3PX7Vq3gyPIfD26dJsdG0KtkxUFzEaLGHSvStNHaYI4 SspzbGfH73MGSu+CKgjE/vogK8uyON37VFePeELlW+VclTvd8NCl4T4zWVcLNBH5Tqnl x7W6sfKdDZdo7mN2LzEs3nreK1uW9S36aXuGUVJbemMTzYDOM6Og8e7c4qOs0lo0AIWX ff3Ni6RzLufjxPJyjpYWaY0f3ZZMz8GTllpbp2FHj4eKCju3UfYeCteBOQw1UlWyX9Lm jdxw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmd2KC73q05LhSTGBU0sboEnubxXhe3eMRay60MqYBm7hM0cs+woSnJGwXG0XIH+Y7t8ALS X-Received: by 10.50.142.67 with SMTP id ru3mr6946911igb.16.1428096996937; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 14:36:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.13.15 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:36:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3508DDEF5F3D264CA45D3A2CCE34EF3F56779598@SINPEX01CL02.citrite.net> References: <3508DDEF5F3D264CA45D3A2CCE34EF3F56779598@SINPEX01CL02.citrite.net> From: David Nalley Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 17:36:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:runseb@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 1:57 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board >> >> Seems with have lazy consensus. >> >> Will Stevens contributed CONTRIBUTING instructions at: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md >> >> I am pushing that to 4.5,4.4 and 4.3 and I will update our website contr= ibution >> page, removing reference to RB. >> I will then put a message in the RB current reviews. >> >> I propose to leave it a week with the message, this will give time to fo= lks to >> move their review to GH. >> >> After that, I will ask ASF infra to =E2=80=9Chide=E2=80=9D RB. They cann= ot make it readonly, we >> can only hide the view. > > If RB is hidden, does that block us from seeing reviews of old patches on= it? > Some of the commits doesn't have much meat in commit message, and in such= cases used to go back to RB where we could get some information seeing rev= iew history/comments. > All comments were copied to the mailing list. --David