cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Laszlo Hornyak <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: getting rid of 3rd party repositories (ceph, libvirt)
Date Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:31:59 GMT
Hi Wido,

I should have read the git log first :-)

No license issues and no code change needed. All I want to have is
rados-java in the central maven repository for two reasons:
- central is the most reliable service
- we can not upload our artifacts to central until we have a dependency on
other repositories, and therefore users and developers are not able to reuse

I will send you a PR for the pom file. This is needed in order to compliy
central repository upload policy, no functional changes, only meta-data.

And then, let's see.. do you own the repository in central repo? Basically
either you can upload or I can upload for you if you give me permission, in
any case I will try to help.

Best regards,
Laszlo

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 04/21/2015 09:12 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have uploaded the libvirt dependency to maven central and you
> > should never get the maven failure if the libvirt.org server goes
> > down, it will be downloaded from central. I have sent a PR (#180)
> > to remove the libvirt.org repository from the build.
> >
> > With ceph.org the situation: - I have requested permission to
> > publish like with libvirt, my request was rejected since the
> > ceph.com team holds ownership - The only solution from here is to
> > change the groupId of the dependency. - org.apache.* is very likely
> > no go, it is owned by apache, artifacts are synchonrized to central
> > through the apache repository, which is for apache artifacts only.
> > - we can upload with a new groupId - suggestions are welcome
> >
>
> I wrote the rados-java bindings and licensed it under the Apache License
> .
>
> I choose com.ceph as a package since that was the easiest way. It
> would be changed but I don't want to break all the existing code for
> users.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Wido
>
> > Regards, Laszlo
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVN0unAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCKbAP/1d8gAmu+//zR/uhFAju+gEI
> TGLvXhFv4uX9IKwGwMS9oiNDxYDQ9GPY17zShf41B271Ft9F8HZ8ovEfj8uauwaV
> sr/2jHhI14Hb7d09vSBc1DmXzJ3iYyrQFYno/z7rVRTHJmJ67xrJPT7+ZjPOxI7E
> aXoZMIBSuKPEJKwJl2vY8AsdFeU1LnPaKPC/vqUqqh94eIw1jk67ZgoCLctKOIig
> 43b0eZiRCrsGsiXYURH8pihlxDKY5ipz5utRY0ngb64xJRx2u/XSBDPFGtiwNR2O
> dWTVACqgqnSKdDdr3cqZ6eDEaxKmViupi672fOTjZjgpnQojWKvLti4DVdcqMFle
> BYGguzVcJZQpt8MSiiS9ATtm4WJkaePQsTS3T4BiqrxIpUfeYhhrCeE3Q+dykIYn
> BdtsMBhAdM930Lv+6Zk/W6mmcxKmeXXU6ImOV95nYnvN53Q2+DEya06fZHsH80nR
> eEO8uzS/Rz2GcumPClVV9Hv+g+nt6gYw+8w+OuVQIsU4YdQ0coOhsOYRleTeurBY
> 3JSZ8q4XX+PCZVpwLOZ6myKgNZFqGjk0CWi6DD3RssCQiZo5yWAJyENfVrX8GjO+
> 8pEQup2ACn/WR/A3o4q4Zq0m4B4u0wYXFmRgQ/kvOxSSeqhMhQlGZPsdrYLbM4P9
> WeH67OGvyb+F/83N5ezx
> =W4ry
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 

EOF

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message