cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nux! <...@li.nux.ro>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
Date Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:54:32 GMT
Marcus,

I can't check if the guid has changed, but the upgrade was a normal one done using "yum update"
from Rohit's el6 repo.

To make things more confusing, 2 upgrades ended up with duplicated local storage, but my last
test has not.
I'll do a couple more tests today to see if the issue is consistent. I'll keep an eye on the
guids.

+1 what you said re bugfix releases.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcus" <shadowsor@gmail.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 05:56:55
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2

> Nux, do you have any way to tell if the local storage guid in the
> agent.properties changed during the upgrade? Was the agent RPM upgraded or
> removed/installed?
> 
> Not that this applies here, but I just wanted to mention that as far as
> bugfix releases go I'd hope that we are mostly worried about regressions.
> In other words, I don't think it makes sense to block a bugfix release just
> because it doesn't fix all known bugs, or is missing a pet patch. If there
> are no known regressions, and improvements over the previous release,
> that's probably a good thing to release. I'd rather that than cut half a
> dozen RCs just to ship a few bugfixes. In fact, I'd prefer to see bugfix
> releases more often and contain fewer changes. Just my .02 on the process.
> On Apr 8, 2015 8:25 AM, "Nux!" <nux@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
>> -1
>>
>> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local
>> storage pool registered 2 times.
>>
>> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same
>> server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com>
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2
>>
>> > I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete
>> > actually works):
>> >
>> > Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value.
>> > Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value
>> format,
>> > or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the
>> > field in api cmd class.
>> >
>> > Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> >> up for a vote:
>> >>
>> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726
>> >> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22
>> >>
>> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> >> location):
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/
>> >>
>> >> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >>
>> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1  approve
>> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > e: mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>> > o: 303.746.7302
>> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*

Mime
View raw message