Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C1B910B47 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18971 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2015 12:42:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 18926 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2015 12:42:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 16625 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2015 09:03:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of antoine.coetsier@exoscale.ch designates 128.65.195.4 as permitted sender) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:02:31 +0100 Subject: Re: query about 4.4 usage From: Antoine Coetsier To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" , "users@cloudstack.apache.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: query about 4.4 usage References: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Daan and users, We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version. Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let=B9s adopt all proper rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in smaller versions being shipped in higher ones. Antoine=20 Le 11.02.15 18:53, =AB Daan Hoogland =BB a =E9crit : >H, > >Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack >strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good >test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on >where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to >put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The >afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm >support. > >What I am wondering now is: >Who else is on 4.4 in production systems? >What versions do you run? >How did you test it before going to production? >What are your migration plans? > >thanks, >--=20 >Daan