cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Subject Re: CloudStack and virtio-scsi support in KVM
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:04:16 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 02/10/2015 08:15 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Hello guys,
> 
> I was wondering what is the current support for implementing
> virtio-scsi support for KVM hypervisors? I couldn't find much by
> googling apart from it has been built into OpenStack already.
> 
> The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be
> increasing the number of devices you can attach to a vm, but also,
> and that's what I am interested in is the ability to use discard
> and reclaim unused blocks from the backend storage like ceph rbd.
> There are also talks about having a greater performance advantage
> as well.
> 

Not done yet, but something which crossed my mind. Shouldn't be a real
problem to do however, it's just a small XML change in the Agent.

Would you mind opening a ticket in Jira?

Wido

> Thanks
> 
> Andrei
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=NzP6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message