cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
Date Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:27:00 GMT
Hi all,

I've been trying to fix few issues, the localstorage seems to work now
among other things. I've identified few more issues that I'll fix today,
after that and fixing such issues (kvmclock) etc let's request David to
spin up another RC.

On Friday 06 February 2015 12:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me.
>
> Would you be willing to put those changes in for 4.5 before we spin up
> another RC, Marcus?
>
> On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
>> things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
>> packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
>> do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
>> targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
>> of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
>> support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
>> the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>> <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>> OK - thanks, Andrei
>>>
>>> Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in
>>> Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a
>>> plan of attack soon.
>>>
>>> Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and
>>> 4.6), I believe.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky <andrei@arhont.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in
>> terms
>>>> of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see
>>>> Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as
>>>> Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.
>>>>
>>>> Andrei
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com>
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
>>>>
>>>>> I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
>>>>> is,
>>>>> so it's great to have your comments.
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
>>>>> <andrei@arhont.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
>>>>>> community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
>>>>>> already,
>>>>>> but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com>
>>>>>>> To: "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: "Wilder Rodrigues" <WRodrigues@schubergphilis.com>,
>>>>>>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org, "int-toolkit"
>>>>>>> <int-toolkit@schubergphilis.com>, "int-cloud"
>>>>>>> <int-cloud@schubergphilis.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
>>>>>>> CS
>>>>>>> 4.5
>>>>>>> (due to this kvmclock issue).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
>>>>>>> determine if
>>>>>>> we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>>>> mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu
>>>>>>>> 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
>>>>>>>> issue would
>>>>>>>> be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
>>>>>>>> <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Wilder,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>> as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>> 4.4.2
>>>>>>>>> to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>>> scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> pretty
>>>>>>>>> smooth with fewer rough edges.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
>>>>>>>>>> and we
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu
>>>>>>>>>> 12.04.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
>>>>>>>>>> cool.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Wilder
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
>>>>>>>>>> <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
>>>>>>>>>> 14.04, I
>>>>>>>>>>> was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> the case).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu
>>>>>>>>>>> 12.04
>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>> be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>>>>>>>>>>> <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Rohit
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu
>>>>>>>>>>> 12.04 (which is what I'm running).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
>>>>>>>>>>> <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local
>>>>>>>>>>> storage
>>>>>>>>>>> seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
>>>>>>>>>>> like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
>>>>>>>>>>> <mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidfire.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any news on this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage
>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in
>>>>>>>>>>> agent.properties).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
>>>>>>>>>>> <WRodrigues@schubergphilis.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:WRodrigues@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, thanks for the clarification.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will test it over the weekend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilder
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav
>>>>>>>>>>> <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Wilder,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which
>>>>>>>>>>> should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
>>>>>>>>>>> d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
>>>>>>>>>>> <WRodrigues@schubergphilis.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:WRodrigues@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Rohit,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
>>>>>>>>>>> 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used
>>>>>>>>>>> and I will test it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit
>>>>>>>>>>> away from the list. :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wilder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav
>>>>>>>>>>> <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Wilder,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>> against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
>>>>>>>>>>> <WRodrigues@schubergphilis.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:WRodrigues@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy
>>>>>>>>>>> with the redundant VPC work.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remarks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * I will test Basic Zone later today
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * For those willing to read, I added the whole events
>>>>>>>>>>> log after the tests results. :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There go my results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :: Environment ::
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone
>>>>>>>>>>> within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Management Server: MacBook Pro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :: Advanced Zone ::
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>>>>>>>> ===============
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Create Account and user for that account ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>> TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain
>>>>>>>>>>> level zone is created ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test delete domain without force option ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>> TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test delete domain with force option ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test update admin details ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test user update API ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test login API with domain ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>> TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran 1 test in 217.296s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> present in the zone for migration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran 10 tests in 816.707s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK (SKIP=1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test_privategw_acl
>>>>>>>>>>> (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL)
>>>>>>>>>>> ... === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran 1 test in 85.883s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test to create service offering ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test to update existing service offering ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>> TestName: test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS
>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test to delete service offering ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran 3 tests in 196.733s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin
>>>>>>>>>>> configuration has no host credentials to check router
>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test restart network ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test router basic setup ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_05_router_basic | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test router advanced setup ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_06_router_advanced | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test stop router ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test_07_stop_router
>>>>>>>>>>> | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test start router ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test reboot router ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran 7 tests in 413.426s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK (SKIP=1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran 2 tests in 481.417s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test create VPC offering ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_01_create_vpc_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test VPC offering without load balancing service ...
>>>>>>>>>>> === TestName: test_03_vpc_off_without_lb | Status : SUCCESS
>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test VPC offering without static NAT service ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>> TestName: test_04_vpc_off_without_static_nat | Status :
>>>>>>>>>>> SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test VPC offering without port forwarding service ...
>>>>>>>>>>> === TestName: test_05_vpc_off_without_pf | Status : SUCCESS
>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test VPC offering with invalid services ... ===
>>>>>>>>>>> TestName: test_06_vpc_off_invalid_services | Status :
>>>>>>>>>>> SUCCESS
>>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test update VPC offering ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_07_update_vpc_off | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test list VPC offering ... === TestName:
>>>>>>>>>>> test_08_list_vpc_off | Status : SUCCESS ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering
>>>>>>>>>>> (integration.acs.tests.test_vpc_offerings.TestVPCOffering)
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> === TestName: test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering | Status
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> EXCEPTION ===
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>>>>>>>> ==========
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR: test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering
>>>>>>>>>>> (integration.acs.tests.test_vpc_offerings.TestVPCOffering)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ran 8 tests in 501.205s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FAILED (errors=1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is expected because we do not have Redundant VPC
>>>>>>>>>>> on 4.5.0, but I already have tests for that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :: CloudStack Events Log ::
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a CSV output from MySQL. You can put it in a cdv
>>>>>>>>>>> file and open with MS Excel or any other spreadsheet tool.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "1","REGISTER.USER.KEY","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed register for the developer API keys","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:40:57"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "2","USER.LOGIN","Completed","user has logged in. The
>>>>>>>>>>> IP Address cannot be determined","2015-01-22 08:41:22"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "3","CONFIGURATION.VALUE.EDIT","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed updating configuration. Name: host New Value:
>>>>>>>>>>> 10.1.1.9","2015-01-22 08:41:36"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "4","REGISTER.USER.KEY","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed register for the developer API keys","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "5","ZONE.CREATE","Completed","Successfully completed
>>>>>>>>>>> creating zone. Zone Name: Summer","2015-01-22 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "6","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.CREATE","Created","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> created entity for Creating Physical Network","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "7","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.CREATE","Scheduled","creating
>>>>>>>>>>> Physical Network. Id: 200","2015-01-22 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "8","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.CREATE","Started","Creating
>>>>>>>>>>> Physical Network. Physical Network Id: 200","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> "9","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Creating Physical Network. Physical Network Id:
>>>>>>>>>>> 200","2015-01-22 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "10","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Created","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> created entity for Creating Physical Network
>>>>>>>>>>> TrafficType","2015-01-22 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "11","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Scheduled","Adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physical
>>>>>>>>>>> network traffic type: 1","2015-01-22 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "12","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Started","Creating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physical
>>>>>>>>>>> Network TrafficType. TrafficType Id: 1","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "13","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Creating Physical Network TrafficType. TrafficType
>>>>>>>>>>> Id: 1","2015-01-22 08:43:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "14","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Created","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> created entity for Creating Physical Network
>>>>>>>>>>> TrafficType","2015-01-22 08:43:10"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "15","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Scheduled","Adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physical
>>>>>>>>>>> network traffic type: 2","2015-01-22 08:43:10"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "16","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Started","Creating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physical
>>>>>>>>>>> Network TrafficType. TrafficType Id: 2","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:43:10"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "17","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Creating Physical Network TrafficType. TrafficType
>>>>>>>>>>> Id: 2","2015-01-22 08:43:10"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "18","NETWORK.ELEMENT.CONFIGURE","Scheduled","configuring
>>>>>>>>>>> virtual router provider: 1","2015-01-22 08:43:15"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "19","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Scheduled","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network ServiceProvider: 1","2015-01-22 08:43:15"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "20","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Started","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network ServiceProvider","2015-01-22 08:43:15"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "21","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Updating physical network
>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceProvider","2015-01-22 08:43:15"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "22","USER.LOGIN","Completed","user has logged in.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>> IP Address cannot be determined","2015-01-22 08:43:19"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "23","NETWORK.ELEMENT.CONFIGURE","Scheduled","configuring
>>>>>>>>>>> virtual router provider: 2","2015-01-22 08:43:20"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "24","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Scheduled","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network ServiceProvider: 3","2015-01-22 08:43:20"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "25","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Started","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network ServiceProvider","2015-01-22 08:43:20"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "26","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Updating physical network
>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceProvider","2015-01-22 08:43:20"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "27","NETWORK.ELEMENT.CONFIGURE","Scheduled","configuring
>>>>>>>>>>> internal load balancer element: 3","2015-01-22 08:43:26"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "28","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Scheduled","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network ServiceProvider: 5","2015-01-22 08:43:26"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "29","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Started","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network ServiceProvider","2015-01-22 08:43:26"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "30","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Updating physical network
>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceProvider","2015-01-22 08:43:26"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "31","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.UPDATE","Scheduled","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> Physical network: 200","2015-01-22 08:43:31"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "32","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.UPDATE","Started","updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network","2015-01-22 08:43:31"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "33","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.UPDATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed updating physical network","2015-01-22 08:43:31"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "34","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.CREATE","Created","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> created entity for Creating Physical Network","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:43:36"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "35","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.CREATE","Scheduled","creating
>>>>>>>>>>> Physical Network. Id: 201","2015-01-22 08:43:36"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "36","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.CREATE","Started","Creating
>>>>>>>>>>> Physical Network. Physical Network Id: 201","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:43:36"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "37","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Creating Physical Network. Physical Network Id:
>>>>>>>>>>> 201","2015-01-22 08:43:36"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "38","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Created","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> created entity for Creating Physical Network
>>>>>>>>>>> TrafficType","2015-01-22 08:43:41"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "39","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Scheduled","Adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physical
>>>>>>>>>>> network traffic type: 3","2015-01-22 08:43:41"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "40","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Started","Creating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physical
>>>>>>>>>>> Network TrafficType. TrafficType Id: 3","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:43:41"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "41","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Creating Physical Network TrafficType. TrafficType
>>>>>>>>>>> Id: 3","2015-01-22 08:43:41"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "42","NETWORK.ELEMENT.CONFIGURE","Scheduled","configuring
>>>>>>>>>>> virtual router provider: 4","2015-01-22 08:43:46"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "43","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Scheduled","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network ServiceProvider: 6","2015-01-22 08:43:46"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "44","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Started","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network ServiceProvider","2015-01-22 08:43:46"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "45","SERVICE.PROVIDER.UPDATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed Updating physical network
>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceProvider","2015-01-22 08:43:46"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "46","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.UPDATE","Scheduled","Updating
>>>>>>>>>>> Physical network: 201","2015-01-22 08:43:51"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "47","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.UPDATE","Started","updating
>>>>>>>>>>> physical network","2015-01-22 08:43:51"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "48","PHYSICAL.NETWORK.UPDATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed updating physical network","2015-01-22 08:43:51"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "49","VLAN.IP.RANGE.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed creating vlan ip range","2015-01-22 08:45:07"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "50","TRAFFIC.TYPE.CREATE","Created","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> created entity for Creating Physical Network TrafficType.
>>>>>>>>>>> Zone
>>>>>>>>>>> Id: 1","2015-01-22 08:45:07"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "51","ZONE.EDIT","Completed","Successfully completed
>>>>>>>>>>> editing zone. Zone Id: 1","2015-01-22 08:45:07"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "52","FIREWALL.OPEN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating firewall rule","2015-01-22 08:45:25"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "53","FIREWALL.OPEN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating firewall rule","2015-01-22 08:45:25"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "54","SERVICE.OFFERING.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed creating service offering. Service offering
>>>>>>>>>>> id=30","2015-01-22 08:55:48"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "55","ACCOUNT.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed creating Account. Account Name: null, Domain
>>>>>>>>>>> Id:null","2015-01-22 08:55:48"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "56","USER.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed
>>>>>>>>>>> creating User. Account Name: null, Domain
>>>>>>>>>>> Id:null","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:55:48"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "57","USER.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed
>>>>>>>>>>> creating User. UserName: User-FGFAQX, FirstName :User,
>>>>>>>>>>> LastName: User","2015-01-22 08:55:49"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "58","ACCOUNT.DELETE","Scheduled","deleting User
>>>>>>>>>>> test-TestUserLogin-test_01_create_account-TPZITS (id: 4) and
>>>>>>>>>>> accountId = 4","2015-01-22 08:55:49"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "59","ACCOUNT.DELETE","Started","deleting account.
>>>>>>>>>>> Account Id: 4","2015-01-22 08:55:49"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "60","ACCOUNT.DELETE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed deleting account. Account Id: 4","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:55:49"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "61","SERVICE.OFFERING.DELETE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed deleting service offering. Service offering
>>>>>>>>>>> id=30","2015-01-22 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "62","DOMAIN.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed creating Domain. Domain Name: Domain-F8DWZU,
>>>>>>>>>>> Parent
>>>>>>>>>>> DomainId :1","2015-01-22 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "63","ACCOUNT.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed creating Account. Account Name: null, Domain
>>>>>>>>>>> Id:1","2015-01-22 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "64","USER.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed
>>>>>>>>>>> creating User. Account Name: null, Domain Id:1","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "65","ACCOUNT.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed creating Account. Account Name: null, Domain
>>>>>>>>>>> Id:2","2015-01-22 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "66","USER.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed
>>>>>>>>>>> creating User. Account Name: null, Domain Id:2","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "67","SERVICE.OFFERING.CREATE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed creating service offering. Service offering
>>>>>>>>>>> id=31","2015-01-22 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "68","VM.CREATE","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entity
>>>>>>>>>>> for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 3","2015-01-22 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "69","VM.CREATE","Scheduled","starting Vm. Vm Id:
>>>>>>>>>>> 3","2015-01-22 08:55:54"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "70","VM.CREATE","Started","starting Vm. Vm Id:
>>>>>>>>>>> 3","2015-01-22 08:55:55"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "71","ZONE.VLAN.ASSIGN","Completed","Assigned Zone
>>>>>>>>>>> Vlan: 132 Network Id: 204","2015-01-22 08:55:56"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "72","FIREWALL.OPEN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating firewall rule","2015-01-22 08:55:56"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "73","VM.CREATE","Completed","Successfully completed
>>>>>>>>>>> starting Vm. Vm Id: 3","2015-01-22 08:58:29"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "74","VM.CREATE","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entity
>>>>>>>>>>> for deploying Vm. Vm Id: 5","2015-01-22 08:58:30"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "75","VM.CREATE","Scheduled","starting Vm. Vm Id:
>>>>>>>>>>> 5","2015-01-22 08:58:30"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "76","VM.CREATE","Started","starting Vm. Vm Id:
>>>>>>>>>>> 5","2015-01-22 08:58:30"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "77","ZONE.VLAN.ASSIGN","Completed","Assigned Zone
>>>>>>>>>>> Vlan: 121 Network Id: 205","2015-01-22 08:58:32"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "78","FIREWALL.OPEN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating firewall rule","2015-01-22 08:58:32"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "79","VM.CREATE","Completed","Successfully completed
>>>>>>>>>>> starting Vm. Vm Id: 5","2015-01-22 09:00:52"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "80","ACCOUNT.DELETE","Scheduled","deleting User
>>>>>>>>>>> test-TestUserLogin-test_01_create_account-M48UPS (id: 6) and
>>>>>>>>>>> accountId = 5","2015-01-22 09:00:56"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "81","ACCOUNT.DELETE","Started","deleting account.
>>>>>>>>>>> Account Id: 6","2015-01-22 09:00:56"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "82","FIREWALL.CLOSE","Started","revoking firewall
>>>>>>>>>>> rule. Account Id: 6","2015-01-22 09:01:08"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "83","FIREWALL.CLOSE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed revoking firewall rule. Account Id: 6","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 09:01:08"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "84","ZONE.VLAN.RELEASE","Completed","Released Zone
>>>>>>>>>>> Vnet: 121 for Network: 205","2015-01-22 09:01:19"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "85","FIREWALL.CLOSE","Started","revoking firewall
>>>>>>>>>>> rule. Account Id: 6","2015-01-22 09:01:19"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "86","FIREWALL.CLOSE","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed revoking firewall rule. Account Id: 6","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 09:01:19"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "87",>> > > > >>>> > >>>>
>> "238","FIREWALL.OPEN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating firewall rule","2015-01-22 09:29:36"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "239","VM.CREATE","Completed","Successfully completed
>>>>>>>>>>> starting Vm. Vm Id: 15","2015-01-22 09:31:57"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "240","FIREWALL.OPEN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating firewall rule","2015-01-22 09:32:00"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "241","NET.IPASSIGN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for allocating Ip. Ip Id: 4","2015-01-22 09:32:00"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "242","NET.IPASSIGN","Scheduled","associating ip to
>>>>>>>>>>> network id: 210 in zone 1","2015-01-22 09:32:00"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "243","NET.IPASSIGN","Started","associating Ip. Ip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Id:
>>>>>>>>>>> 4","2015-01-22 09:32:00"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "244","NET.IPASSIGN","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed associating Ip. Ip Id: 4","2015-01-22 09:32:00"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "245","FIREWALL.OPEN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating firewall rule. Rule Id: 5","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 09:32:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "246","FIREWALL.OPEN","Scheduled","Creating firewall
>>>>>>>>>>> rule for Ip: 10.1.3.5 for protocol:TCP","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 09:32:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "247","FIREWALL.OPEN","Started","creating firewall
>>>>>>>>>>> rule. Rule Id: 5","2015-01-22 09:32:05"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "248","FIREWALL.OPEN","Completed","Successfully
>>>>>>>>>>> completed creating firewall rule. Rule Id: 5","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 09:32:08"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "249","FIREWALL.OPEN","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating firewall rule","2015-01-22 09:32:10"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "250","NET.RULEADD","Created","Successfully created
>>>>>>>>>>> entity for creating forwarding rule. Rule Id: 6","2015-01-22
>>>>>>>>>>> 09:32:10"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "251","NET.RULEADD","Scheduled","Applying >> > > >
>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>

--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Mime
View raw message