Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of daan.hoogland@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <85B56B1AEDD2674A82DEC8B61E1218292587C880@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
References: 
 <CAGQtxvZis3evPU6YtjHYyJjOxd4uDkS2GFPK3-afVcUkZ3JDnA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGQtxvZqJX=thRkzpmyTQVPMabJ+PHRjiJwOyDJvoY=rUSrT7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <85B56B1AEDD2674A82DEC8B61E1218292587C880@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:24:50 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAGQtxvYNs3jVNpnRVqZ=DCpJL32f4SkwugA_rACPwBss4G90Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your
 information)
To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

no worries, everybody is busy with glibc anyway these days. I didn't
have any feedback to our pages, however, That worries me more.

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Stephen Turner
<Stephen.Turner@citrix.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I was ill yesterday. But I wasn't sure what more we had to discuss before the hardware arrives.
>
> --
> Stephen Turner
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogland@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 January 2015 12:39
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)
>
> I did not see any reactions, are we on for tonight?
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> H,
>>
>> This is a question for feedback (fyi == For Your Input;). In the
>> meetings we had so far, we created a couple of lists. These are our
>> only deliverables to date. In order to know if we are on the right
>> track I would like some feedback.
>>
>> First of all there is the highlevel requirement [1]. It should contain
>> everything we want to accomplish in the end. We will revisit it next
>> Wednesday and in regular iterations while the project goes on. I hope
>> everybody that won't attend next session will have their comments sent
>> to us by then.
>>
>> Then there are two detail pages that we have come up with so far and
>> these are not done until there is some form of consensus on them in
>> the community. Especially [2] is a page that we should all agree on in
>> the end. Right now it is just a working document that we will use to
>> implement our own way of working and later propose everybody will. It
>> describes what we think are the basics of cloudstack as opposed to the
>> extras that people should support on their own and will be abandoned
>> if nobody does.
>>
>> The third page [3] contains a set of requirements that we think will
>> make a gate for contributions that is workable for the community.
>>
>> please have a look and give us your feedback.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Quality+and+Pro
>> cess+Improvement+Initiative [2]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+basi
>> c+functionalities [3]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Gate+requiremen
>> ts
>>
>>
>> (fyi: we are looking to implement a simple contribution workflow based
>> on github in combination with jenkins pull request builder for now and
>> are still considering what would have to be done to implement
>> something like gerrit.)
>>
>> thanks,
>> --
>> Daan
>
>
>
> --
> Daan


-- 
Daan