Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FE2917A21 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40781 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2015 09:08:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-dev-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 40732 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2015 09:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 40703 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2015 09:08:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:08:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of runseb@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.182] (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:08:43 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h11so9280903wiw.3 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:07:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nL+J4P6Nh56CCJPNZVqVBeHCdUBusiaT74MokK3+I/Q=; b=tcsXXusRtAoAp6dYARxHc7MfnMhpQyrRBF8olylwJRKJQ6ickeYg/gv2L4JZoo5s/u yw7mo15LiRu5vBBaH4UNA1HYxOfKFkusoTdBGtyKPlSsI9ZUU5FtDxqZmTXU0QW3QA8Y vDP9WciYuNZ83VfdUqu9qLU8zMxBs/q8MVFhmZATfmKMf3s3AX5FiQGLql5xgnqz+kIh ZWg50rC1dxCDUULNc1fgy5WHKpXdzLaRk/S11BVoShxJfN58lkWEj0oROqMMbp9DMEcl N2NC0BbEhsRMFOpsL9+Ywhdi3lGsvg+FT2LKgi6GtlhplekRjZVDa65F10IoedBr9GNT h+1w== X-Received: by 10.180.228.37 with SMTP id sf5mr6543317wic.35.1421226457969; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:07:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.6] (131-177.199-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.199.177.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f1sm29163227wjw.30.2015.01.14.01.07.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:07:36 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? From: sebgoa In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:07:36 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0E69D35F-A4AE-4E7C-B1BB-EC3DD93FD774@gmail.com> References: <1124825565.20713.1421190887829.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> <2029836727.20777.1421193282823.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jan 14, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Marcus wrote: > Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could > release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster > 11.0' If I wanted. I did not even know it was coming. But I agree with Marcus, citrix = clouplatform could be at 11.0 right now, it would not mean anything in = terms of semantic versioning vs cloudstack releases. > I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some > extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something. > It would be a little demoralizing if it were the latter, given the low > amount of participation on the lists regarding ACS 4.5 recently it > would seem like an end-run around the community. I doubt it's that > though; the community has largely been focusing on making 4.3 and 4.4 > more bulletproof, and I'm sure Citrix has a timeline they need to meet > and can't let their own releases be slowed by us. >=20 > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Conrad Geiger = wrote: >> Don't take it back. I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, = it has today's date on it. >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone >>=20 >>=20 >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Nux! >> Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00) >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? >>=20 >> Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say "release = highlights", not that it was released: >> = https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highl= ights/ >>=20 >> I take it back! :) >>=20 >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>=20 >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >>=20 >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Ian Duffy" >>> To: "CloudStack Dev" >>> Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24 >>> Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? >>=20 >>> That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release = notes >>> on there site? >>> On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, "Nux!" wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hi, >>>>=20 >>>> I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' "Fedora", = not the >>>> other way around. >>>> Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a = 4.5 >>>> ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover = during RC >>>> period. >>>>=20 >>>> Lucian >>>>=20 >>>> -- >>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>>>=20 >>>> Nux! >>>> www.nux.ro >>=20