cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Turner <>
Subject RE: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)
Date Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:20:48 GMT
Sorry, I was ill yesterday. But I wasn't sure what more we had to discuss before the hardware

Stephen Turner

-----Original Message-----
From: Daan Hoogland [] 
Sent: 28 January 2015 12:39
To: dev
Subject: Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

I did not see any reactions, are we on for tonight?

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daan Hoogland <> wrote:
> H,
> This is a question for feedback (fyi == For Your Input;). In the 
> meetings we had so far, we created a couple of lists. These are our 
> only deliverables to date. In order to know if we are on the right 
> track I would like some feedback.
> First of all there is the highlevel requirement [1]. It should contain 
> everything we want to accomplish in the end. We will revisit it next 
> Wednesday and in regular iterations while the project goes on. I hope 
> everybody that won't attend next session will have their comments sent 
> to us by then.
> Then there are two detail pages that we have come up with so far and 
> these are not done until there is some form of consensus on them in 
> the community. Especially [2] is a page that we should all agree on in 
> the end. Right now it is just a working document that we will use to 
> implement our own way of working and later propose everybody will. It 
> describes what we think are the basics of cloudstack as opposed to the 
> extras that people should support on their own and will be abandoned 
> if nobody does.
> The third page [3] contains a set of requirements that we think will 
> make a gate for contributions that is workable for the community.
> please have a look and give us your feedback.
> [1] 
> cess+Improvement+Initiative [2] 
> c+functionalities [3] 
> ts
> (fyi: we are looking to implement a simple contribution workflow based 
> on github in combination with jenkins pull request builder for now and 
> are still considering what would have to be done to implement 
> something like gerrit.)
> thanks,
> --
> Daan

View raw message