cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: Physical network design options - which crime to comit
Date Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:42:14 GMT
Thanks Somesh, first option also seems most logical to me.

I guess you wouldn't consider doing nic bonding and then vlans with some
QoS based on vlans on switch level?

Thx again

Sent from Google Nexus 4
On Dec 26, 2014 9:48 PM, "Somesh Naidu" <Somesh.Naidu@citrix.com> wrote:

> I generally prefer to keep the storage traffic separate. Reason is that
> storage performance (provision templates to primary, snapshots, copy
> templates, etc) significantly impact end user experience. In addition, it
> also helps isolate network issues when troubleshooting.
>
> So I'd go for one of the following in that order:
> Case I
> 1G = mgmt network (only mgmt)
> 10G = Primary and Secondary storage traffic
> 10G = Guest and Public traffic
>
> Case II
> 10G = Primary and Secondary storage traffic
> 10G = mgmt network, Guest and Public traffic
>
> Case III
> 10G = mgmt network, Primary and Secondary storage traffic
> 10G = Guest and Public traffic
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.panic@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 10:06 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Physical network design options - which crime to comit
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm designing some stuff - and wondering which crime to commit - I have 2
> posible scenarios in my head
> I have folowing NICs available on compute nodes:
> 1 x 1G NIC
> 2 x 10G NIC
>
> I was wondering which approach would be better, as I', thinking about 2
> possible sollutions at the moment, maybe 3.
>
> *First scenario:*
>
> 1G = mgmt network (only mgmt)
> 10G = Primary and Secondary storage traffic
> 10G = Guest and Public traffic
>
>
> *Second scenario*
>
> 1G = not used at all
> 10G = mgmt,primary,secondary storage
> 10G = Guest and Public
>
>
> And possibly a 3rd scenario:
>
> 1G = not used at all
> 10G = mgmt+primary storage
> 10G = secondary storage, guest,public network
>
>
> I could continue here with different scenarios - but I'm wondering if 1G
> dedicated for mgmt would make sense - I know it is "better" to have it
> dedicated if possible, but folowing "KISS" and knowing it's extremely light
> weight traffic - I was thinkin puting everything on 2 x 10G interfaces.
>
> Any opinions are most welcome.
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message