cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
Subject Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.
Date Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:50:07 GMT
Fair enough.  :)  Just merge the branch this time and we will figure out
the details going forward.  I think reducing the work for the person doing
the merge will help collaboration (even if the committer has to do a bit
more work), so I am open to how we do this...

ws


*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
wrote:

> as a pragmatic programmer, yes. In light of the work we are starting
> on wednesday, no. I leave picking the answer as an excercise to the
> reader;)
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Will Stevens <wstevens@cloudops.com>
> wrote:
> > I am not hosting a public repo with the fix.  I think a merge is the
> > simplest way.  A pull request is great for non-committers to contribute,
> > but I think it is a bit disjointed for committers who already have access
> > to create fix branches.  Do you agree?
> >
> > ws
> >
> >
> > *Will STEVENS*
> > Lead Developer
> >
> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> lgtm,
> >>
> >> do i look for a pull request, or just merge?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Will Stevens <wstevens@cloudops.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > We need to get my fix '[MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959'merged in to
> get
> >> the
> >> > system vms building again.  The building is currently broken because
> of a
> >> > compatibility issues.
> >> >
> >> > This merge should be made asap...
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > *Will STEVENS*
> >> > Lead Developer
> >> >
> >> > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> >> > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> >> > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion891@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> few question about 4.5;
> >> >>
> >> >> - which systemvm should we use? jenkins job build-systemvm-4.5 is a
> >> month
> >> >> old.
> >> >> - upgrade path seams damaged, previous bug CLOUDSTACK-8041 is
> >> >> false, although I've never succeed to upgrade a system so far.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion@cloudops.com
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > The upgrade path require a systemvm-template otherwise the database
> >> >> > upgrade fail, I've create this one: CLOUDSTACK-8041
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Could it be possible to just look for the latest template to exist
> >> during
> >> >> > a db upgrade? with the current check, to upgrade from 4.2.1
> require to
> >> >> have
> >> >> > the systemvm-template of 4.3,4.4 and 4.5 of all hypervisors in
> order
> >> to
> >> >> > successfully upgrade the database. is this something easy to fix?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:53 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us>
> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hi All,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following
> artifacts
> >> >> >> up for review:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20141206T0129
> >> >> >> Commit: fcfc3060ff5a7aa2c57548ded90298c0920921fd
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at
the same
> >> >> >> location):
> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc0/
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> PGP release keys (signed using A15F30B9):
> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Because this is an early RC, I am not going to yet call a
vote on
> it,
> >> >> >> but rather going to let it set and let folks see if it's tenable.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> PLEASE test, and leave feedback in this thread.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --David
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daan
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message